Association between depression and neuropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis
Abstract
Objective: Depression and neuropathy are frequent complications of type 2 diabetes. The current meta‐analysis aimed to estimate the association between depression and neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases for articles published up to February 2015, providing data on the association between depression and neuropathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes. No language restrictions were applied. The meta‐analysis generated random‐effect odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Risk of publication bias and heterogeneity were estimated using the Egger test and I2 index, respectively. Leave‐one‐out analysis was performed. Data were analysed using stata. Results: Thirteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. Data on the association between depression and neuropathy were available for 3898 individuals with type 2 diabetes. Pooled analysis showed an association between depression and neuropathy, with an odds ratio of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.60–2.54; p < 0.001). There was no risk of publication bias (p = 0.064), and heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 44.5%). Leave‐one‐out analysis confirmed consistency of the findings. The association appeared partly influenced by age, because studies selecting older people (sample mean age > 65 years) showed a slightly higher estimate for the association. Conclusions: We found an association between depression and neuropathy among people with type 2 diabetes. Because of the cross‐sectional nature of included studies, the relationship between these two conditions might be bidirectional. Further research exploring factors that might moderate or mediate this association is needed. Targeted interventions for comorbid depression and neuropathy should be implemented in clinical practice. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 13 cross-sectional studies (n=3,898 with diabetes mellitus), depression in diabetes mellitus was associated with neuropathy OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.60-2.54).
“13 cross-sectional studies ( n = 3,898 with diabetes mellitus) | Depression | *Depression in diabetes mellitus associated with neuropathy OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.60-2.54).”
From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and psychological stress — a modifiable risk factor (2017) · cites this paper as Bartoli (2016) 141
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 51 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Bartoli, F., Carrà, G., Crocamo, C., Carretta, D., La Tegola, D., Tabacchi, T., Gamba, P., & Clerici, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- University College London (GB)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano‐Bicocca Monza (MB) Italy
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bartoli, Francesco
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 829-836
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2224403078
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- depression, diabetic neuropathy, type 2 diabetes, comorbidities, bidirectional relationship, age as confounder, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Comorbidity, Publication Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review