Systematic review of dyadic and family‐oriented interventions for late‐life depression
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Supportive behaviors (both instrumental and emotional) from spouses and close family members can impact the trajectory of older adults' depressive symptoms. Interventions that target both the patient and support person may be more effective than interventions that target the patient only, in terms of alleviating mood symptoms in the identified patient. The purpose of this paper was to review the characteristics and findings of dyadic and family‐oriented interventions for late‐life mood disorders to determine if they are effective and beneficial. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of reports in the literature on dyadic or family‐oriented interventions for late‐life mood disorders. We searched PubMed, OVID PsycINFO, and EMBASE for peer‐reviewed journal articles in English through October 2014. Results: We identified 13 articles, representing a total of 10 independent investigations. Identified studies focused on spouses and close family members as support persons. Effect sizes for dyadic interventions that treated major depressive disorder were, on average, moderately strong, while effect sizes for dyadic interventions that reduced depressive symptoms were generally small. We did not identify any dyadic studies that treated bipolar disorder. Conclusions: This review showed that dyadic interventions are feasible and that these interventions can decrease symptomatology in individuals who have major depressive disorder. Research is needed to understand the relative efficacy of a dyadic approach over a single‐target approach in treating depression. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dyadic interventions such as ecosystems therapy, psychoeducation, family counseling, behavioral therapy, and cognitive behavior therapy are feasible and effective for the treatment of late-life depression.
“A recent systematic review of family-oriented interventions found that dyadic interventions such as ecosystems therapy, psychoeducation, family counseling, behavioral therapy, and CBT are feasible and effective for the treatment of LLD323.”
From Psychobiological factors of resilience and depression in late life (2019) · cites this paper as [323]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Stahl, S. T., Rodakowski, J., Saghafi, E. M., Park, M., Reynolds, C. F., & Dew, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stahl, Sarah T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-21
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 963-973
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- PMC
- PMC5166608
- OpenAlex
- W2260629122
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30 MH090333, P60 MD000207, MHO19986, K01MH103467, KL2TR000146, K01NR015101, UL1 TR000005)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- geriatric depression, dyadic intervention, family-centered intervention, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, spouses, family caregivers, supportiveness, older adults, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Family, Family Therapy, Humans, Spouses, Mood Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review