Cited by 40Aging, Health, and DisabilityMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Systematic review of dyadic and family‐oriented interventions for late‐life depression

Open access
Stahl, Sarah T., Rodakowski, Juleen, Saghafi, Ester M., Park, Mijung, Reynolds, Charles F., Dew, Mary Amanda·2016·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Supportive behaviors (both instrumental and emotional) from spouses and close family members can impact the trajectory of older adults' depressive symptoms. Interventions that target both the patient and support person may be more effective than interventions that target the patient only, in terms of alleviating mood symptoms in the identified patient. The purpose of this paper was to review the characteristics and findings of dyadic and family‐oriented interventions for late‐life mood disorders to determine if they are effective and beneficial. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of reports in the literature on dyadic or family‐oriented interventions for late‐life mood disorders. We searched PubMed, OVID PsycINFO, and EMBASE for peer‐reviewed journal articles in English through October 2014. Results: We identified 13 articles, representing a total of 10 independent investigations. Identified studies focused on spouses and close family members as support persons. Effect sizes for dyadic interventions that treated major depressive disorder were, on average, moderately strong, while effect sizes for dyadic interventions that reduced depressive symptoms were generally small. We did not identify any dyadic studies that treated bipolar disorder. Conclusions: This review showed that dyadic interventions are feasible and that these interventions can decrease symptomatology in individuals who have major depressive disorder. Research is needed to understand the relative efficacy of a dyadic approach over a single‐target approach in treating depression. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4434

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dyadic interventions such as ecosystems therapy, psychoeducation, family counseling, behavioral therapy, and cognitive behavior therapy are feasible and effective for the treatment of late-life depression.

    “A recent systematic review of family-oriented interventions found that dyadic interventions such as ecosystems therapy, psychoeducation, family counseling, behavioral therapy, and CBT are feasible and effective for the treatment of LLD323.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 40

Authors
Stahl, S. T., Rodakowski, J., Saghafi, E. M., Park, M., Reynolds, C. F., & Dew, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Stahl, Sarah T.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-21
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
963-973
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2260629122
Cited by
40
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P30 MH090333, P60 MD000207, MHO19986, K01MH103467, KL2TR000146, K01NR015101, UL1 TR000005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
geriatric depression, dyadic intervention, family-centered intervention, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, spouses, family caregivers, supportiveness, older adults, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Family, Family Therapy, Humans, Spouses, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review