Cited by 156Human-Animal Interaction StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Effect of animal‐assisted interventions on depression, agitation and quality of life in nursing home residents suffering from cognitive impairment or dementia: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
Olsen, Christine, Pedersen, Ingeborg, Bergland, Astrid, Enders‐Slegers, Marie‐José, Patil, Grete, Ihlebæk, Camilla·2016·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in cognitively impaired nursing home residents is known to be very high, with depression and agitation being the most common symptoms. The possible effects of a 12‐week intervention with animal‐assisted activities (AAA) in nursing homes were studied. The primary outcomes related to depression, agitation and quality of life (QoL). Method: A prospective, cluster randomized multicentre trial with a follow‐up measurement 3 months after end of intervention was used. Inclusion criteria were men and women aged 65 years or older, with a diagnosis of dementia or having a cognitive deficit. Ten nursing homes were randomized to either AAA with a dog or a control group with treatment as usual. In total, 58 participants were recruited: 28 in the intervention group and 30 in the control group. The intervention consisted of a 30‐min session with AAA twice weekly for 12 weeks in groups of three to six participants, led by a qualified dog handler. Norwegian versions of the Cornell Scale for Depression, the Brief Agitation Rating Scale and the Quality of Life in Late‐stage Dementia scale were used. Results: A significant effect on depression and QoL was found for participants with severe dementia at follow‐up. For QoL, a significant effect of AAA was also found immediately after the intervention. No effects on agitation were found. Conclusions: Animal‐assisted activities may have a positive effect on symptoms of depression and QoL in older people with dementia, especially those in a late stage. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resident or visiting dogs in prisons, nursing homes, mental institutions, and hospitals can reduce patient anxiety in a hospital emergency department, reduce pain perceptions in children after surgery, or calm young patients at a pediatric dental clinic.

    “Examples include resident or visiting dogs in prisons, nursing homes [33], mental institutions, and hospitals where they can reduce patient anxiety in a hospital emergency department [34], reduce pain perceptions in children after surgery [35], or calm young patients at a pediatric dental clinic [36].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 156

Authors
Olsen, C., Pedersen, I., Bergland, A., Enders‐Slegers, M., Patil, G., & Ihlebæk, C.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Olsen, Christine
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-25
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
1312-1321
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2254114366
Cited by
156
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
FWCI
16.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Oslofjordfondet and RFF Hovedstaden, NMBU (217516)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
animal-assisted activities, animal-assisted interventions, dementia, depression, agitation, quality of life, nursing home residents, older adults, dogs, neuropsychiatric symptoms, late-stage dementia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Depressive Disorder, Dogs, Female, Humans, Male, Norway, Nursing Homes, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Agitation, Quality of Life, Pets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review