Cited by 99Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Course of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: 5-year longitudinal study

Vik‐Mo, Audun Osland, Giil, Lasse Melvaer, Ballard, Clive, Aarsland, Dag·2018·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in dementia are frequent and challenging for patients, carers, and the health care system, but few long-term studies exist. We analyse the longitudinal course of NPS in patients with mild dementia. METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study of 223 patients with mild dementia and annual assessments using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) for 5 years. RESULTS: A total 1043 NPI assessments, representing 97% of all possible measurements of living cohort members, were analysed. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were common at baseline, and only a moderate increase in total NPS score from 15 to 17 with no increase in the proportion with high NPI total scores. Ninety seven percent scored ≥16, and 49% scored ≥36 on NPI total score at least once during follow-up. Individual NPS fluctuated and often reappeared. The most common symptoms ever reported was apathy (83%), depression (63%), appetite (63%), and aberrant motor behavior (60%). Cognitive decline was associated with higher NPI total score and several NPI items, but only the frequency of apathy increased significantly with time. Lewy body dementia was associated with higher NPI total score and psychotic symptoms. Alzheimer's disease was associated with increase in apathy. CONCLUSIONS: Severe NPS are already common at time of dementia diagnosis, and the increase in overall severity over 5 years was moderate. Individual symptoms tend to fluctuate over time within patients and correspond to states rather than traits. These findings highlight the need to focus on, and plan for, NPS as part of dementia pathway, and are relevant for clinical trial design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4933

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 99

Authors
Vik‐Mo, A. O., Giil, L. M., Ballard, C., & Aarsland, D.
Affiliations
  • Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
  • Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus (NO)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Vik‐Mo, Audun Osland
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-06
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
1361-1369
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2822298048
Cited by
99
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Helse Vest (Clinical practice (911208))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
neuropsychiatric symptoms, mild dementia, longitudinal course, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, apathy, depression, aberrant motor behavior, appetite, cognitive decline, dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic symptoms, symptom fluctuation, dementia care planning
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Mental Disorders, Dementia, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Norway, Apathy, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review