Cited by 22Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the radiative forcing of contrail cirrus contaminated by black carbon

Liou, K. N., Takano, Y., Yue, Q., Yang, P.·2013·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The effects of internal and external mixings of black carbon (BC) (soot) in ice particles on the radiative properties of contrail cirrus are investigated using a simple ice plate model. The internal mixing state absorbs substantially more radiation as compared with its external mixing counterpart due to light absorption enhancement from all directions. The soot absorption effect is largely confined to wavelengths shorter than about 1.4 µm, beyond which ice absorption predominates. For an ice crystal size of 5 µm internally mixed with a soot particle of 0.1 µm radius in contrail cirrus with an optical depth of 0.5, the instantaneous radiative forcings at the top of and within the atmosphere are approximately 0.2 and 0.8 W/m2, respectively. In view of the likelihood of multiple inclusions of soot particles in contrail cirrus, these values are lower limits. Thus, a realistic assessment of the global and regional radiative forcings of contrail cirrus for climate studies must account for the radiative effect induced by soot mixing states associated with the microscopic formation of ice particles.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/grl.50110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. d'Almeida G. A., 1991, Atmospheric Aerosols
  2. 10.1002/andp.18842591008 · DOI
  3. 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2008:POTRPO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  4. 10.1029/2010JD014574 · DOI
  5. 10.1029/2011JD017020 · DOI
  6. Krekov G. M., 1993, Aerosol Effects on Climate, 9
  7. 10.1029/2008GL033918 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.04.004 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.03.007 · DOI
  10. 10.1029/97GL03508 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/02786829808965575 · DOI
  12. 10.1029/1999JD900460 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/S0169-8095(97)00083-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1029/2001JD000813 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1029/98JD00807 · DOI
  16. 10.1175/JAS-D-12-039.1 · DOI
  17. 10.1029/1999JD900755 · DOI
  18. 10.1364/AO.44.005512 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liou, K. N., Takano, Y., Yue, Q., & Yang, P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2013-02-27
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
778-784
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1487444385
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
contrail cirrus, black carbon, soot, internal mixing, external mixing, radiative forcing, soot absorption, ice particle formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review