Cited by 37Digitalization, Law, and RegulationPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionThoreau and American Literature

California takes the lead on data privacy law

Rothstein, Mark A., Tovino, Stacey A.·2019·Hastings Center Report

Abstract

In the early 1970s, Congress considered enacting comprehensive privacy legislation, but it was unable to do so. In 1974, it passed the Privacy Act, applicable only to information in the possession of the federal government. In the intervening years, other information privacy laws enacted by Congress, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, have been weak and sector specific. With the explosion of information technology and the growing concerns about an absence of effective federal privacy laws, the legal focus has shifted to the states. Signaling a new direction in state data privacy and consumer protection law, the California Consumer Privacy Act establishes important rights and protections for California residents with regard to the collection, use, disclosure, and sale of their personal information. The CCPA is certain to spur similar legislation and to affect national and international businesses that collect data from California's residents. Understanding the new law is important for all data‐driven industries, including health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hast.1042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Raw STR profiles from patient-derived xenografts are considered personal data under the GDPR and CCPA.

    “regulatory regimes such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) [109] and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) remind us that raw STR profiles from patient-derived xenografts are considered personal data [110,111].”

Cited by

Authors
Rothstein, M. A., & Tovino, S. A.
Venue
Hastings Center Report
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
4-5
ISSN
  • 0093-0334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-146X
OpenAlex
W2979068396
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
48.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Hastings Center Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
Keywords
California Consumer Privacy Act, data privacy law, personal data, consumer protection, HIPAA, federal privacy legislation, cross-border data flows
MeSH terms
California, Confidentiality, Data Collection, Humans, Patient Advocacy, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Privacy, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Government Regulation, Information Dissemination, Federal Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review