Cited by 112Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCultural Competency in Health Care

Trust, Risk, and Race in American Medicine

Open access
Sullivan, Laura Specker·2020·Hastings Center Report

Abstract

There is ample evidence that patient mistrust toward the American medical system is to some extent associated with communal and individual experiences of racism. For groups who have faced exploitation and discrimination at the hands of physicians, the medical profession, and medical institutions, trust is a tall order and, in many cases, would be naive. Nevertheless, trust is often regarded as a central feature of the physician‐patient relationship. In this article, I draw on empirical research, ethical theory, and clinical cases to propose one way that providers might address and, ideally, resolve mistrust when it arises in an immediate case. I describe how medical mistrust has been characterized empirically within medical and bioethics scholarship, and I provide an overview of theories of trust, arguing that they may be unable to account for the risks that providers must take in seeking to establish trust within many American medical institutions. Common assumptions in medical and bioethical scholarship on trust notwithstanding, caring and competence are not always enough to establish a trusting relationship between physician and patient. I suggest that, in an atmosphere of mistrust, comprehension of the existence and source of suspicion is essential to effective signaling of trustworthiness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hast.1080

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients' past negative experiences can hinder patient-provider communication and impair trust-building, making patients hesitate to engage in collaborative care.

    “Patients’ past negative experiences can hinder patient-provider communication and impair trust-building, making patients hesitate to engage in collaborative care [64,65].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 112

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. E. Pellegrino, R. Veatch, and J. Langan [Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1991], 69-85). I also use "suspicion" to describe an element of mistrust. I appre- ciate the suggestion of an anonymous re- viewer that suspicion and mistrust may not be quite the same thing, and I agree that exploring this would be a fruitful direction for future work on mistrust.
  2. S. S. Smith, "Race and Trust," Annual Review of Sociology 36 (2010): 453-75.
  3. K. M. Hoffman et al., "Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs about Biological Differences between Blacks and Whites," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (2016): 4296-301;
  4. J. Katz, The Silent World of Doctor and Patient (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984);
  5. Pellegrino, "Trust and Distrust in Professional Ethics." 6. An important aspect of this is uncover- ing the extent to which clinical ethics con- sultation requests correlate with race and gender (B. Spielman et al., "Gender and Race in the Timing of Requests for Ethics Consultations: A Single-Center Study," Journal of Clinical Ethics 27, no. 2 [2016]: 154-62).
  6. B. H. Gray, "Trust and Trustworthy Care in the Managed Care Era," Health Affairs 16, no. 1 (1997): 34-49;
  7. A. Buchanan, "Trust in Managed Care Organizations," Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10, no. 3 (2000): 189-212;
  8. R. Rhodes and J. J. Strain, "Trust and Transforming Medical Institutions," Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9, no. 2 (2000): 205-17.
  9. S. D. Goold, "Trust, Distrust, and Trustworthiness," Journal of General Internal Medicine 17, no. 1 (2002): 79-81.
  10. D. H. Thom and B. Campbell, "Physician-Patient Trust: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Family Practice 44, no. 2 (1997): 169-76;
  11. D. Mechanic and S. Meyer, "Concepts of Trust among Patients with Serious Illness," Social Science & Medicine 51, no. 5 (2000): 657-68;
  12. S. D. Pearson and L. H. Raeke, "Patients' Trust in Physicians: Many Theories, Few Measures, and Little Data," Journal of General Internal Medicine 15, no. 7 (2000): 509-13;
  13. M. A. Hall et al., "Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What Is It, Can It Be Measured, and Does It Matter?," Milbank Quarterly 79, no. 4 (2001): 613-39;
  14. L. E. Egede and C. Ellis, "Development and Testing of the Multidimensional Trust in Health Care Systems Scale," Journal of General Internal Medicine 23, no. 6 (2008): 808-15.
  15. Goold, "Trust, Distrust, and Trustworthiness"; K. L. Moseley et al., "Measuring African-American Parents' Cultural Mistrust While in a Healthcare Setting: A Pilot Study," Journal of the National Medical Association 99, no. 1 (2007): 15-21.
  16. Thom and Campbell, "Physician- Patient Trust." 14. G. Corbie-Smith et al., "Attitudes and Beliefs of African Americans toward Participation in Medical Research," Journal of General Internal Medicine 14, no. 9 (1999): 537-46.
  17. L. E. Boulware et al., "Race and Trust in the Health Care System," Public Health Reports 118, no. 4 (2003): 358-65.
  18. M. J. Arnett et al., "Race, Medical Mistrust, and Segregation in Primary Care as Usual Source of Care: Findings from the Exploring Health Disparities in Integrated Communities Study," Journal of Urban Health 93, no. 3 (2016): 456-67;
  19. C. H. Halbert et al., "Racial Differences in Trust in Health Care Providers," Archives of Internal Medicine 166 (2006): 896-901.
  20. J. C. Wiltshire, S. D. Person, and J. Allison, "Exploring Differences in Trust in Doctors among African-American Men and Women," Journal of the National Medical Association 103, no. 9-10 (2011): 845-51.
  21. A. Baier, "Trust and Antitrust," Ethics 96, no. 2 (1986): 231-60, at 235.
  22. K. Jones, "Trustworthiness," Ethics 123, no. 1 (2012): 61-85, at 67.
  23. K. Jones, "Trust as an Affective Attitude," Ethics 107, no. 1 (1996): 4-25, at 4.
  24. Hall, "Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions." There is also ample theoretical work on trust in medical in- stitutions (C. Clark, "Trust in Medicine," Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27, no. 1 [2002]: 11-29). Here, I focus on interper- sonal trust between physicians and patients and so draw primarily from work on rela- tional ethics.
  25. K. S. Johnson et al., "Improving the Care of Culturally Diverse Patients: Strategies to Address and Navigate the Elephant in the Room," Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 57, no. 2 (2019): 357. This is part of the reason for the ex- plosion of interest in cultural competence, which takes a broader approach to improv- ing intercultural communication in health care than the relatively narrow focus on trust here (J. R. Betancourt et al., "Defining Cultural Competence: A Practical Framework for Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health and Health Care," Public Health Reports 118, no. 4 [2003]: 293-302;
  26. S. Saha, M. C. Beach, and L. A. Cooper, "Patient Centeredness, Cultural Competence and Healthcare Quality," Journal of the National Medical Association 100, no. 11 [2008]: 1275-85).
  27. M. U. Walker, Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoing (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006);
  28. T. Govier, "Distrust as a Practical Problem," Journal of Social Philosophy 23, no. 1 (1992): 52-63;
  29. T. Govier, "Trust, Distrust, and Feminist Theory," Hypatia 7, no. 1 (1992): 16-33.
  30. S. Harding, "Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is 'Strong Objectivity?,'" in Feminist Epistemologies, ed. L. Alcoff and E. Potter (New York: Routledge, 1992), 68.
  31. K. Hawley, "Trust, Distrust, and Epistemic Injustice," in The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, ed. I. J.
  32. Kidd, J. Medina, and G. Pohlhaus Jr. (New York: Routledge, 2017).
  33. S. Wright, "Trust and Trustworthiness," Philosophia 38, no. 3 (2010): 615-27.

Authors
Sullivan, L. S.
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Laura Specker
Venue
Hastings Center Report
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
ISSN
  • 0093-0334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-146X
OpenAlex
W3007087634
Cited by
112
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Hastings Center Report (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of South Carolina
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
medical mistrust, physician-patient relationship, racism in medicine, racial discrimination, trustworthiness, medical ethics
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Black or African American, Communication, Humans, Models, Psychological, Patient Care Planning, Physician-Patient Relations, Prejudice, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Bioethical Issues, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review