The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting media richness theory for today and future
Open accessAbstract
Media richness theory was developed in the mid-1980s in the field of business management and became very popular along with the diffusion of electronic communication media. Despite the popularity, inconsistent results from empirical studies have been the issues with this theory. In addition, the recent advanced communication technology has been raising more challenges towards the original concepts. Thus, we have reviewed the literature in the past decade to illustrate diverse applications and validity of the theory with more recent communication channels. Based on the findings we have also discussed a future of media richness theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511
CHANNEL EXPANSION THEORY AND THE EXPERIENTIAL NATURE OF MEDIA RICHNESS PERCEPTIONS.
Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257090 · Cited by 1,270
Cited by
Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: A mixed‐method approach
Nesher Shoshan, H., & Wehrt, W. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12360 · Cited by 304
Saffarizadeh, K., University of Texas at Arlington, Keil, M., Georgia State University, Boodraj, M., Boise State University, Alashoor, T., & University of Navarra (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00839 · Cited by 41
Patient-Generated Health Photos and Videos Across Health and Well-being Contexts: Scoping Review
Ploderer, B., Rezaei Aghdam, A., & Burns, K. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28867 · Cited by 18
Nkoala, S. (2024) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2023.2289887 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishii, K., Lyons, M. M., & Carr, S. A.
- Venue
- Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-131
- ISSN
- 2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2941420785
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
