Cited by 147Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentMultisensory perception and integration

Relation between brain activation and lexical performance

Open access
Booth, James R., Burman, Douglas D., Meyer, Joel R., Gitelman, Darren R., Parrish, Todd B., Mesulam, M. Marsel·2003·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to determine whether performance on lexical tasks was correlated with cerebral activation patterns. We found that such relationships did exist and that their anatomical distribution reflected the neurocognitive processing routes required by the task. Better performance on intramodal tasks (determining if visual words were spelled the same or if auditory words rhymed) was correlated with more activation in unimodal regions corresponding to the modality of sensory input, namely the fusiform gyrus (BA 37) for written words and the superior temporal gyrus (BA 22) for spoken words. Better performance in tasks requiring cross-modal conversions (determining if auditory words were spelled the same or if visual words rhymed), on the other hand, was correlated with more activation in posterior heteromodal regions, including the supramarginal gyrus (BA 40) and the angular gyrus (BA 39). Better performance in these cross-modal tasks was also correlated with greater activation in unimodal regions corresponding to the target modality of the conversion process (i.e., fusiform gyrus for auditory spelling and superior temporal gyrus for visual rhyming). In contrast, performance on the auditory spelling task was inversely correlated with activation in the superior temporal gyrus possibly reflecting a greater emphasis on the properties of the perceptual input rather than on the relevant transmodal conversions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.10111

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 147

Authors
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-23
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
155-169
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2086982363
Cited by
147
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Santen
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R21DC006149)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD042049)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
lexical processing, brain activation, spelling, fusiform gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, visual word recognition, auditory word processing
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reading, Speech, Task Performance and Analysis, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review