Sensitivity of prefrontal cortex to changes in target probability: a functional MRI study
Open accessAbstract
Electrophysiological studies suggest sensitivity of the prefrontal cortex to changes in the probability of an event. The purpose of this study was to determine if subregions of the prefrontal cortex respond differentially to changes in target probabilities using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Ten right‐handed adults were scanned using a gradient‐echo, echo planar imaging sequence during performance of an oddball paradigm. Subjects were instructed to respond to any letter but “X”. The frequency of targets (i.e., any letter but X) varied across trials. The results showed that dorsal prefrontal regions were active during infrequent events and ventral prefrontal regions were active during frequent events. Further, we observed an inverse relation between the dorsal and ventral prefrontal regions such that when activity in dorsal prefrontal regions increased, activity in ventral prefrontal regions decreased, and vice versa. This finding may index competing cognitive processes or capacity limitations. Most importantly, these findings taken as a whole suggest that any simple theory of prefrontal cortex function must take into account the sensitivity of this region to changes in target probability. Hum. Brain Mapping 13:26–33, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deliberative processing is subserved by a network including lateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
“Research on the neural mechanisms that subserve deliberative processing has generally focused on a network of interacting brain centers including the lateral prefrontal cortex most prominently, but also regions of the posterior parietal cortex and areas of the dorsal prefrontal midline (especially the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex)”
From Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent risk-taking (2013) · cites this paper as Casey et al., 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 160
- Authors
- Casey, B. J., Forman, S. D., Franzen, P., Berkowitz, A., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Thomas, K. M., & Noll, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871821
- OpenAlex
- W2027529751
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- prefrontal cortex, target probability, oddball paradigm, dorsal prefrontal cortex, ventral prefrontal cortex, probability of events, capacity constraints, prefrontal function
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Probability Learning, Psychomotor Performance, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review