Cited by 160Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Sensitivity of prefrontal cortex to changes in target probability: a functional MRI study

Open access
Casey, B. J., Forman, Steven D., Franzen, Peter, Berkowitz, Aaron, Braver, Todd S., Nystrom, Leigh E., Thomas, Kathleen M., Noll, Douglas C.·2001·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Electrophysiological studies suggest sensitivity of the prefrontal cortex to changes in the probability of an event. The purpose of this study was to determine if subregions of the prefrontal cortex respond differentially to changes in target probabilities using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Ten right‐handed adults were scanned using a gradient‐echo, echo planar imaging sequence during performance of an oddball paradigm. Subjects were instructed to respond to any letter but “X”. The frequency of targets (i.e., any letter but X) varied across trials. The results showed that dorsal prefrontal regions were active during infrequent events and ventral prefrontal regions were active during frequent events. Further, we observed an inverse relation between the dorsal and ventral prefrontal regions such that when activity in dorsal prefrontal regions increased, activity in ventral prefrontal regions decreased, and vice versa. This finding may index competing cognitive processes or capacity limitations. Most importantly, these findings taken as a whole suggest that any simple theory of prefrontal cortex function must take into account the sensitivity of this region to changes in target probability. Hum. Brain Mapping 13:26–33, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.1022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deliberative processing is subserved by a network including lateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.

    “Research on the neural mechanisms that subserve deliberative processing has generally focused on a network of interacting brain centers including the lateral prefrontal cortex most prominently, but also regions of the posterior parietal cortex and areas of the dorsal prefrontal midline (especially the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex)”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 160

Authors
Casey, B. J., Forman, S. D., Franzen, P., Berkowitz, A., Braver, T. S., Nystrom, L. E., Thomas, K. M., & Noll, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-03-12
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
26-33
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2027529751
Cited by
160
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, target probability, oddball paradigm, dorsal prefrontal cortex, ventral prefrontal cortex, probability of events, capacity constraints, prefrontal function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Probability Learning, Psychomotor Performance, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review