Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging
Open accessAbstract
Attentional switching has shown to involve several prefrontal and parietal brain regions. Most cognitive paradigms used to measure cognitive switching such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) involve additional cognitive processes besides switching, in particular working memory (WM). It is, therefore, questionable whether prefrontal brain regions activated in these conditions, especially dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), are involved in cognitive switching per se, or are related to WM components involved in switching tasks. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine neural correlates of pure switching using a paradigm purposely designed to minimize WM functions. The switching paradigm required subjects to switch unpredictably between two spatial dimensions, clearly indicated throughout the task before each trial. Fast, event‐related fMRI was used to compare neural activation associated with switch trials to that related to repeat trials in 20 healthy, right‐handed, adult males. A large cluster of activation was observed in the right hemisphere, extending from inferior prefrontal and pre‐ and postcentral gyri to superior temporal and inferior parietal cortices. A smaller and more caudal cluster of homologous activation in the left hemisphere was accompanied by activation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We conclude that left DLPFC activation is involved directly in cognitive switching, in conjunction with parietal and temporal brain regions. Pre‐ and postcentral gyrus activation may be related to motor components of switching set. Hum. Brain Mapp.21:247–256, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The brain regions commonly activated by WCST, ID/ED, and TMT involve fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal areas.
“As shown in Table 1 (in the main text), regions commonly activated during these tasks are related to fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal brain regions [59–65].”
From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Smith, A. B., Taylor, E., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 247-256
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871965
- OpenAlex
- W2010551055
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- attentional shift, set switching, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex, working memory, spatial attention, hemispheric lateralization
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review