Brain activity underlying emotional valence and arousal: a response-related fMRI study
Open accessAbstract
Emotional behavior is organized along two psychophysiologic dimensions: (1) valence, varying from negative to positive, and (2) arousal, varying from low to high. Behavioral responses along these dimensions are assumed to be mediated by different brain circuits. We recorded startle reflex modulation and skin conductance responses in healthy volunteers during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they viewed a set of emotional pictures and took verbal ratings of the emotional valence and arousal of each picture after scanning. Response‐related multiple correlation analysis revealed differential brain activity in five brain regions. Startle reflex changes, associated with the valence of a stimulus, correlated with activity in the amygdala, while verbal reports of negative emotional valence varied with insular activity. Peripheral physiologic and verbal responses along the arousal dimension varied with thalamic and frontomedial activity. Peripheral physiologic responses along both dimensions correlated with activity in somatosensory association areas in the anterior parietal cortex. In the valence dimension, activity in the left anterior parietal cortex was associated with highly correlating peripheral physiologic and verbal responses, suggesting that verbal reports of emotional valence might depend partly on brain circuits representing peripheral physiologic changes. Our data provide direct evidence for a functional segregation of brain structures underlying peripheral physiologic responses and verbal ratings along the emotional dimensions of valence and arousal. Hum. Brain Mapp. 23:200–209, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regions specific to positive and negative valence have been identified, including VLPFC and insula for negatively-valenced pictures and words.
“Regions specific to positive and negative valence have also been identified, in particular roles for ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) (Kensinger and Schacter, 2006) and insula (Anders et al., 2004;Lewis et al., 2007) in response to negatively-valenced pictures and words.”
From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Anders et al., 2004
The AI plays an integral role in the response and experience of emotional states, and its level of activity has been shown to correlate with stimulus valence.
“The AI plays an integral role in the response and experience of emotional states (Craig, 2003), and level of activity has been shown to correlate with stimulus valence (Anders et al., 2004).”
From Cortico-striatal-thalamic loop circuits of the salience network: A central pathway in psychiatric disease and treatment (2016) · cites this paper as Anders et al., 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 341
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tranel D (2000): Electrodermal activity in cognitive neuroscience: neuroanatomical and neuropsychological correlates. In: Lane RD, Nadel L, editors. Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. New York: Oxford University Press. p 192-224.
- Authors
- Anders, S., Lotze, M., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Birbaumer, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 200-209
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871723
- OpenAlex
- W2074784010
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Volkswagen Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- emotional valence, emotional arousal, amygdala, insula, thalamus, anterior parietal cortex, startle response, skin conductance, emotional pictures, brain-behavior relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Arousal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Hemodynamics, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Reflex, Startle, Verbal Behavior, Peripheral Nervous System
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review