Cited by 134Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Regional cerebral blood flow in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Comparison before and after methylphenidate treatment

Open access
Lee, Jae Sung, Kim, Boong Nyun, Kang, Eunjoo, Lee, Dong Soo, Kim, Yu Kyeong, Chung, June‐Key, Lee, Myung Chul, Cho, Soo Churl·2005·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Differences in brain activity of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been compared to normal healthy controls, suggesting neural correlates of cognitive/behavioral symptoms. Symptoms are improved with methylphenidate treatment but limited sources can be cited to show how brain activity in ADHD is altered after pharmacologic treatment. We investigated how long‐term oral medication of methylphenidate affects the resting regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in ADHD children, using single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). rCBF was decreased in the orbitofrontal cortex and middle temporal gyrus in the right hemisphere whereas it was increased in the dorsomedial prefrontal and somatosensory area bilaterally in drug‐naïve ADHD children compared to control child subjects. After treatment with methylphenidate, the extent of hyperperfusion in the somatosensory area was reduced and significant reduction of rCBF was found in the right striatum for the first time. Methylphenidate treatment also resulted in rCBF increase in superior prefrontal and reduction in ventral higher visual areas bilaterally. The results indicated that improving ADHD symptom after methylphenidate is associated with normalization of abnormally reduced orbitofrontal activity and abnormally increased somatosensory cortical activity. These changes were accompanied with reduced striatum activity lower than that of normal controls. These changes might be associated with improving ADHD to control attention and motor response to irrelevant environmental stimuli after methylphenidate treatment. Hum. Brain Mapp 24:157–164, 2005. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20067

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with methylphenidate normalizes the hypoperfusion of prefrontal areas and is associated with corresponding improvement in ADHD symptoms.

    “treatment with methylphenidate normalizes the hypoperfusion of prefrontal areas and is associated with corresponding improvement in ADHD symptoms [60][61][62][63][64][65].”

    From Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach (2017) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Results report that prefrontal and orbitofrontal hypoperfusion recovered to normal levels after methylphenidate treatment, and that ADHD symptoms improved. The Discussion says the normalization *may* be associated with symptom improvement; the claim presents that association as established. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 134

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chang LT (1978): A method of attenuation correction in radio- nuclide computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 25:638 - 643.

Authors
Lee, J. S., Kim, B. N., Kang, E., Lee, D. S., Kim, Y. K., Chung, J., Lee, M. C., & Cho, S. C.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10-18
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
157-164
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2044798205
Cited by
134
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, regional cerebral blood flow, resting-state brain activity, orbitofrontal cortex, somatosensory cortex, striatum, prefrontal cortex, middle temporal gyrus, SPECT, children
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Child, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Methylphenidate, Regional Blood Flow, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review