Brain activity associated with painfully hot stimuli applied to the upper limb: A meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
The capacity of pain to alert against potential injury or focus attention on damaged tissue is enhanced by the intrinsically aversive nature of the experience. Finding methods to relieve pain will ultimately be facilitated by deeper understanding of the processes that contribute to the experience, and functional brain imaging has contributed substantially toward that end. An impressive body of literature has identified a distributed network of pain‐related activity in the brain that is subject to considerable modulation by different stimulus parameters, contextual factors, and clinical conditions. The fundamental substrates of the pain network are yet to be distilled from the highly variable results of studies published thus far. Qualitative reviews of the pain‐imaging literature have been contributory, but lack the greater surety of quantitative methods. We employ the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta‐analytic technique to establish the most consistent activations among studies reporting brain responses subsequent to the application of noxious heat. A network of pain‐related activity was replicated for stimuli to either upper limb that included two discernible regions of the mid‐anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral thalami, insula, and opercula cortices, posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum. The findings of the meta‐analysis resonate with other streams of information that continue to enhance our understanding of pain in the brain. The results also point toward new areas of research that may be fruitful for the exploration of central pain processing. Hum Brain Mapp 25:129–139, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medial wall motor areas are activated when humans experience or anticipate painful stimuli.
“It is also commonly observed that medial wall motor areas are activated when humans experience or anticipate painful stimuli (16, 26–28).”
From Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. (2007) · cites this paper as [28]
Because of an a priori hypothesis that threatening the hand would activate certain areas associated with pain anticipation and anxiety, a small volume correction was used in these regions.
“Because we had an a priori hypothesis that threatening the hand would activate certain areas associated with pain anticipation and anxiety, we used a small volume correction in these regions (15, 17, 28, 36)”
From Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. (2007) · cites this paper as [28]
Coactivation of the ACC and anterior insula in imaging experiments is strongly linked to emotional processing and interoceptive awareness.
“Coactivation of the ACC and anterior insula in imaging experiments is strongly linked to emotional processing and introceptive awareness (28, 35, 36).”
From Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. (2007) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Farrell, M. J., Laird, A. R., & Egan, G. F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farrell, Michael J.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-21
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-139
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871740
- OpenAlex
- W2172291461
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- pain, noxious heat, upper limb, brain activation, pain network, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, posterior parietal cortex, supplementary motor area, cerebellum, central pain processing, activation likelihood estimation
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Hot Temperature, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Upper Extremity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review