The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing
Open accessAbstract
Previous research has implicated a portion of the anterior temporal cortex in sentence‐level processing. This region activates more to sentences than to word‐lists, sentences in an unfamiliar language, and environmental sound sequences. The current study sought to identify the relative contributions of syntactic and prosodic processing to anterior temporal activation. We presented auditory stimuli where the presence of prosodic and syntactic structure was independently manipulated during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Three “structural” conditions included normal sentences, sentences with scrambled word order, and lists of content words. These three classes of stimuli were presented either with sentence prosody or with flat supra‐lexical (list‐like) prosody. Sentence stimuli activated a portion of the left anterior temporal cortex in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and extending into the middle temporal gyrus, independent of prosody, and to a greater extent than any of the other conditions. An interaction between the structural conditions and prosodic conditions was seen in a more dorsal region of the anterior temporal lobe bilaterally along the superior temporal gyrus (STG). A post‐hoc analysis revealed that this region responded either to syntactically structured stimuli or to nonstructured stimuli with sentence‐like prosody. The results suggest a parcellation of anterior temporal cortex into 1) an STG region that is sensitive both to the presence of syntactic information and is modulated by prosodic manipulations (in nonsyntactic stimuli); and 2) a more inferior left STS/MTG region that is more selective for syntactic structure. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · Cited by 2,212
Self-citationHow Many Subjects Constitute a Study?
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., & Worsley, K. J. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0439 · Cited by 814 · cited 1×
“A random effects analysis of the individual subject results was then used to test between-subject differences [ Friston et al., 1999 ].”
MethodEffects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow
Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562843 · Cited by 327
Cited by
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Self-citationPrice, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 · Cited by 2,159
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.
Friederici, A. D. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 · Cited by 2,140
The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension
Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20422 · Cited by 703
The functional neuroanatomy of language
Hickok, G. (2009) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2009.06.001 · Cited by 444
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphries, C., Love, T., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-13
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-138
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2024667724
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20148
- The paper
- Humphries, C., Love, T., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Response of anterior temporal cortex to syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.