The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG
Open accessAbstract
Interactions between functionally specialized brain regions are crucial for normal brain function. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) are techniques suited to capture these interactions, because they provide whole head measurements of brain activity in the millisecond range. More than one sensor picks up the activity of an underlying source. This field spread severely limits the utility of connectivity measures computed directly between sensor recordings. Consequentially, neuronal interactions should be studied on the level of the reconstructed sources. This article reviews several methods that have been applied to investigate interactions between brain regions in source space. We will mainly focus on the different measures used to quantify connectivity, and on the different strategies adopted to identify regions of interest. Despite various successful accounts of MEG and EEG source connectivity, caution with respect to the interpretation of the results is still warranted. This is due to the fact that effects of field spread can never be completely abolished in source space. However, in this very exciting and developing field of research this cautionary note should not discourage researchers from further investigation into the connectivity between neuronal sources. Hum Brain Mapp 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods
Granger, C. W. J. (2010) · Essays in Econometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753978.002 · Cited by 4,762
Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals
Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 3,798
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 · Cited by 2,531
Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis
Friston, K. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020107 · Cited by 2,452
Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG
Nunez, P. L., & Harth, E. (1982) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2915137 · Cited by 2,232
Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain
Gross, J., Kujala, J., Hämäläinen, M., Timmermann, L., Schnitzler, A., & Salmelin, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.694 · Cited by 1,810
Self-citationPartial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination
Baccalá, L. A., & Sameshima, K. (2001) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/pl00007990 · Cited by 1,779
Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency
Nolte, G., Bai, O., Wheaton, L., Mari, Z., Vorbach, S., & Hallett, M. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029 · Cited by 1,756
Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962275 · Cited by 1,692
Cited by
The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview
Van Essen, D. C., Smith, S. M., Barch, D. M., Behrens, T. E. J., Yacoub, E., & Ugurbil, K. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 · Cited by 5,651
Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia
Uhlhaas, P. J., & Singer, W. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2774 · Cited by 2,120
A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls
Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationSpectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions
Siegel, M., Donner, T. H., & Engel, A. K. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3137 · Cited by 1,295
Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity
Hipp, J. F., Hawellek, D. J., Corbetta, M., Siegel, M., & Engel, A. K. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3101 · Cited by 1,113
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoffelen, J., & Gross, J.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1857-1865
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2147899888
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 14.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20745
- The paper
- Schoffelen, J., & Gross, J. (2009). Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20745
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
