Cited by 327Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Metaanalytic connectivity modeling: Delineating the functional connectivity of the human amygdala

Open access
Robinson, Jennifer L., Laird, Angela R., Glahn, David C., Lovallo, William R., Fox, Peter T.·2010·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging has evolved into an indispensable tool for noninvasively investigating brain function. A recent development of such methodology is the creation of connectivity models for brain regions and related networks, efforts that have been inhibited by notable limitations. We present a new method for ascertaining functional connectivity of specific brain structures using metaanalytic connectivity modeling (MACM), along with validation of our method using a nonhuman primate database. Drawing from decades of neuroimaging research and spanning multiple behavioral domains, the method overcomes many weaknesses of conventional connectivity analyses and provides a simple, automated alternative to developing accurate and robust models of anatomically‐defined human functional connectivity. Applying MACM to the amygdala, a small structure of the brain with a complex network of connections, we found high coherence with anatomical studies in nonhuman primates as well as human‐based theoretical models of emotive‐cognitive integration, providing evidence for this novel method's utility. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20854

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 327

Authors
Robinson, J. L., Laird, A. R., Glahn, D. C., Lovallo, W. R., & Fox, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Scott & White Memorial Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Oklahoma City VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-14
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
173-184
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2169661556
Cited by
327
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA012207)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074457, R56MH074457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
functional connectivity, amygdala, brain networks, connectivity model
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Automation, Brain, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Databases, Factual, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review