Layer-specific BOLD activation in human V1
Open accessAbstract
The neocortex is known to have a distinct laminar structure which has previously been probed in animals using high-resolution fMRI. Detection of layer-specific activation in humans has however to date proven elusive. In this study we demonstrate for the first time such layer-specific activation, specifically at a depth corresponding to layer IV of human primary visual cortex (V1). We used a gradient-echo (GE) sequence at 3T with an isotropic resolution of 0.75 mm, in which a stria at the depth of layer IV was visible in the averaged time series, and could be used as an anatomical landmark. Upon visual stimulation (7.5 Hz flickering checkerboard) the signal increase of 3% in layer IV was significantly higher than in the neighboring laminae. The width of this activation peak was 0.8-1 mm. Based on this result and known laminar organization of the intracortical vasculature we conclude that in the direction perpendicular to the cortical surface the intrinsic spatial resolution of the GE-BOLD fMRI signal is in the submillimetre range. Human laminar fMRI is a significant development which may improve our understanding of intracortical activation patterns and of the way in which different cortical regions interact.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With high-field MRI, it is now possible, in principle, to obtain sufficiently high resolution that separate cortical layers can be imaged in humans.
“With the advent of high-field MRI, it is now possible, in principle, to obtain sufficiently high resolution that separate cortical layers can be imaged in humans (e.g., Koopmans et al., 2010; Olman et al., 2012).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Koopmans et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 220
- Authors
- Koopmans, P. J., Barth, M., & Norris, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DE)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-17
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1297-1304
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6870878
- OpenAlex
- W2012897638
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- laminar fMRI, layer 4, BOLD signal, cortical depth, spatial resolution, visual stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review