Dehydration affects brain structure and function in healthy adolescents
Open accessAbstract
It was recently observed that dehydration causes shrinkage of brain tissue and an associated increase in ventricular volume. Negative effects of dehydration on cognitive performance have been shown in some but not all studies, and it has also been reported that an increased perceived effort may be required following dehydration. However, the effects of dehydration on brain function are unknown. We investigated this question using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 10 healthy adolescents (mean age = 16.8, five females). Each subject completed a thermal exercise protocol and nonthermal exercise control condition in a cross‐over repeated measures design. Subjects lost more weight via perspiration in the thermal exercise versus the control condition (P < 0.0001), and lateral ventricle enlargement correlated with the reduction in body mass (r = 0.77, P = 0.01). Dehydration following the thermal exercise protocol led to a significantly stronger increase in fronto‐parietal blood‐oxygen‐level‐dependent (BOLD) response during an executive function task (Tower of London) than the control condition, whereas cerebral perfusion during rest was not affected. The increase in BOLD response after dehydration was not paralleled by a change in cognitive performance, suggesting an inefficient use of brain metabolic activity following dehydration. This pattern indicates that participants exerted a higher level of neuronal activity in order to achieve the same performance level. Given the limited availability of brain metabolic resources, these findings suggest that prolonged states of reduced water intake may adversely impact executive functions such as planning and visuo‐spatial processing. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adequate hydration is associated with improved cognitive functioning.
“which is associated with improved cognitive functioning.49–51”
From Critical connections: health and academics (2015) · cites this paper as [51]
Access to drinking water helps students increase water consumption and maintain adequate hydration.
“access to drinking water helps students increase water consumption and maintain adequate hydration”
From Critical connections: health and academics (2015) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 178
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Smith MS (1998): Sport specific ergometry and the physiological demands of amateur boxing. PhD Thesis, Southampton University.
- Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988): A Co-planar Stereotactic Atlas of a Human Brain. Stuttgart: Thieme.
- Wang Z, Fernandez-Seara MA, Alsop DC, Liu WC, Benasich A, Wang J, Detre JA, CASL perfusion MRI in normal infant brain development. Proceedings of ISMRM. (2006): Abstract 3403.
- Authors
- Kempton, M. J., Ettinger, U., Foster, R., Williams, S. C. R., Calvert, G. A., Hampshire, A., Zelaya, F. O., O'Gorman, R. L., McMorris, T., Owen, A. M., & Smith, M. S.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- University of Chichester (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-14
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-79
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6869970
- OpenAlex
- W2066277271
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Wellcome Trust
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Et 31/2-1., 31/2-1)
- Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- dehydration, brain structure, lateral ventricle enlargement, brain function, executive function, Tower of London, BOLD signal, cerebral perfusion, adolescents, cognitive performance, visuospatial processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Body Temperature, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Dehydration, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review