Cited by 89Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Response inhibition and reward anticipation in medication‐naïve adults with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A within‐subject case‐control neuroimaging study

Open access
Carmona, Susana, Hoekzema, Elseline, Ramos‐Quiroga, J. Antoni, Richarte, Vanesa, Canals, Clara, Bosch, Rosa, Rovira, Mariana, Carlos Soliva, Juan +4 more·2012·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Background : Previous research suggests that ADHD patients are characterized by both reduced activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) during response inhibition tasks (such as the Go‐NoGo task), and reduced activity in the ventral striatum during reward anticipation tasks (such as the Monetary‐Incentive‐Delay [MID] task). However, no prior research has applied either of these paradigms in medication‐naïve adults with ADHD, nor have these been implemented in an intrasubject manner. Methods : The sample consisted of 19 medication‐naïve adults with ADHD and 19 control subjects. Main group analyses were based on individually defined regions of interest: the IFG and the VStr for the Go‐NoGo and the MID task respectively. In addition, we analyzed the correlation between the two measures, as well as between these measures and the clinical symptoms of ADHD. Results : We observed reduced bilateral VStr activity in adults with ADHD during reward anticipation. No differences were detected in IFG activation on the Go‐NoGo paradigm. Correlation analyses suggest that the two tasks are independent at a neural level, but are related behaviorally in terms of the variability of the performance reaction time. Activity in the bilateral VStr but not in the IFG was associated negatively with symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity. Conclusions : Results underline the implication of the reward system in ADHD adult pathophysiology and suggest that frontal abnormalities during response inhibition performance may not be such a pivotal aspect of the phenotype in adulthood. In addition, our findings point toward response variability as a core feature of the disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 33:2350–2361, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21368

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults with ADHD, most studies report reduced activation in the ventral striatum during anticipation of monetary gains compared to controls.

    “In adults with ADHD most studies report reduced activation in the ventral striatum (VS) during anticipation of monetary gains compared to controls,4,21,22 with one exception.23”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 89

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, Washington, DC, American Psychitric Association.
  2. First M, Spitzer R, Williams BW (1994): Structured Clinical Inter- view for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Patient Edition (SCID-P), Version 2. New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  3. First M, Gibbon M, Spitzer R, Williams BW, Benjamin LS (1997): Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders SCID-II. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press.

Authors
Carmona, S., Hoekzema, E., Ramos‐Quiroga, J. A., Richarte, V., Canals, C., Bosch, R., Rovira, M., Carlos Soliva, J., Bulbena, A., Tobeña, A., Casas, M., & Vilarroya, O.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital Del Mar (ES)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-08
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
2350-2361
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2060517307
Cited by
89
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, response inhibition, reward anticipation, ventral striatum, inferior frontal gyrus, go/no-go task, monetary incentive delay task, hyperactivity/impulsivity, response variability, reward systems
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reward, Case-Control Studies, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review