The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulating creativity via the exposure to other people’s ideas
Open accessAbstract
As it is the case in brainstorming, each single idea a person generates to a specific problem may stimulate new ideas or solutions in others. In this fMRI study, we investigate the effects of cognitive stimulation via the exposure to other people's ideas on the originality of generated ideas. Participants are requested to generate alternative uses of conventional everyday objects subsequent to a short cognitive stimulation intervention in which they are exposed to other ideas, which were either common or highly original. In a control condition, meaningless pseudowords are shown. Results suggest that cognitive stimulation via common or moderately creative ideas was effective in improving creativity. At the neurophysiological level, temporo-parietal brain regions (primarily right-hemispheric) turned out to be particularly sensitive to cognitive stimulation, possibly indicating that cognitive stimulation via relevant memory cues results in a state of heightened focused attention to memory that facilitates efficient retrieval and recombination of existing knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In particular, nodes of the medial temporal lobe subsystem of the core network implicated in detailed event and scene processing (Andrews-Hanna et al. 2010), such as the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule, have been found to exhibit greater activity during these tasks compared with various controls”
From Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking (2019) · cites this paper as Fink et al. 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · Cited by 16,319
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565
The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl004 · Cited by 5,128
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060
The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 · Cited by 3,889
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.
Amabile, T. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997 · Cited by 2,278
von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00172-0 · Cited by 1,553
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Osborn AF, 1957, Applied imagination
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EEG alpha power and creative ideation
Fink, A., & Benedek, M. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.12.002 · Cited by 600
Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., Hodges, D. A., Koschutnig, K., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.019 · Cited by 456
“…regions within the default mode network (DMN) have been reported in several recent studies of divergent thinking (Benedek et al., 2014; Ellamil, Dobson, Beeman, & Christoff, 2012; Fink et al., 2009; 2012; Gonen-Yaacovi et al., 2013; Jung et al., 2010; Takeuchi et al., 2012; Wei et al., 2014).”
To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021 · Cited by 407
Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention
Benedek, M., Schickel, R. J., Jauk, E., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.010 · Cited by 354
Self-citationCreating metaphors: the neural basis of figurative language production
Benedek, M., Beaty, R., Jauk, E., Koschutnig, K., Fink, A., Silvia, P. J., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.046 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Ischebeck, A., Weiss, E. M., & Ebner, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Graz (AT)
- Medical University of Graz (AT)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-30
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2603-2610
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6870350
- OpenAlex
- W2142609040
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- creativity, cognitive stimulation, idea originality, brainstorming, temporoparietal cortex, right hemisphere, memory retrieval, knowledge recombination, focused attention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Creativity, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review