Cited by 151Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceDesign Education and PracticeNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulating creativity via the exposure to other people’s ideas

Open access

Abstract

As it is the case in brainstorming, each single idea a person generates to a specific problem may stimulate new ideas or solutions in others. In this fMRI study, we investigate the effects of cognitive stimulation via the exposure to other people's ideas on the originality of generated ideas. Participants are requested to generate alternative uses of conventional everyday objects subsequent to a short cognitive stimulation intervention in which they are exposed to other ideas, which were either common or highly original. In a control condition, meaningless pseudowords are shown. Results suggest that cognitive stimulation via common or moderately creative ideas was effective in improving creativity. At the neurophysiological level, temporo-parietal brain regions (primarily right-hemispheric) turned out to be particularly sensitive to cognitive stimulation, possibly indicating that cognitive stimulation via relevant memory cues results in a state of heightened focused attention to memory that facilitates efficient retrieval and recombination of existing knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21387

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Osborn AF, 1957, Applied imagination

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Metadata

Authors
Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Ischebeck, A., Weiss, E. M., & Ebner, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-30
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
2603-2610
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2142609040
Cited by
151
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
creativity, cognitive stimulation, idea originality, brainstorming, temporoparietal cortex, right hemisphere, memory retrieval, knowledge recombination, focused attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Creativity, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review