Cited by 56Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The role of the pulvinar in distractor processing and visual search

Open access
Strumpf, Hendrick, Mangun, George R., Boehler, Carsten N., Stoppel, Christian, Schoenfeld, Mircea A., Heinze, Hans‐Jochen, Hopf, Jens‐Max·2013·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

The pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus are hypothesized to coordinate attentional selection in the visual cortex. Different models have, however, been proposed for the precise role of the pulvinar in attention. One proposal is that the pulvinar mediates shifts of spatial attention; a different proposal is that it serves the filtering of distractor information. At present, the relation between these possible operations and their relative importance in the pulvinar remains unresolved. We address this issue by contrasting these proposals in two fMRI experiments. We used a visual search paradigm that permitted us to dissociate neural activity reflecting shifts of attention from activity underlying distractor filtering. We find that distractor filtering, but not the operation of shifting attention, is associated with strong activity enhancements in dorsal and ventral regions of the pulvinar as well as in early visual cortex areas including the primary visual cortex. Our observations indicate that distractor filtering is the preponderant attentional operation subserved by the pulvinar, presumably mediated by a modulation of processing in visual areas where spatial resolution is sufficiently high to separate target from distractor input. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21496

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human imaging studies report pulvinar activation consistent with filtering of distractors, such that only information pertaining to the attended target can be decoded from patterns of activity.

    “Human imaging studies report pulvinar activation that is consistent with the filtering of distractors [50–52], such that only information pertaining to the attended target can be decoded from patterns of activity [53].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 56

Authors
Strumpf, H., Mangun, G. R., Boehler, C. N., Stoppel, C., Schoenfeld, M. A., Heinze, H., & Hopf, J.
Affiliations
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1115-1132
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2073159385
Cited by
56
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0727115)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
pulvinar, thalamus, distractor filtering, visual search, spatial attention, attentional shift, primary visual cortex, visual cortex, selective attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain Mapping, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Orientation, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Pulvinar, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review