Cited by 119Child Abuse and TraumaFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Childhood maltreatment is associated with a sex‐dependent functional reorganization of a brain inhibitory control network

Open access
Elton, Amanda, Tripathi, Shanti P., Mletzko, Tanja, Young, Jonathan, Cisler, Josh M., James, G. Andrew, Kilts, Clinton D.·2014·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Childhood adversity represents a major risk factor for drug addiction and other mental disorders. However, the specific mechanisms by which childhood adversity impacts human brain organization to confer greater vulnerability for negative outcomes in adulthood is largely unknown. As an impaired process in drug addiction, inhibitory control of behavior was investigated as a target of childhood maltreatment (abuse and neglect). Forty adults without Axis‐I psychiatric disorders (21 females) completed a Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and underwent functional MRI (fMRI) while performing a stop‐signal task. A group independent component analysis identified a putative brain inhibitory control network. Graph theoretical analyses and structural equation modeling investigated the impact of childhood maltreatment on the functional organization of this neural processing network. Graph theory outcomes revealed sex differences in the relationship between network functional connectivity and inhibitory control which were dependent on the severity of childhood maltreatment exposure. A network effective connectivity analysis indicated that a maltreatment dose‐related negative modulation of dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) activity by the left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) predicted better response inhibition and lesser attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in females, but poorer response inhibition and greater ADHD symptoms in males. Less inhibition of the right IFC by dACC in males with higher CTQ scores improved inhibitory control ability. The childhood maltreatment‐related reorganization of a brain inhibitory control network provides sex‐dependent mechanisms by which childhood adversity may confer greater risk for drug use and related disorders and by which adaptive brain responses protect individuals from this risk factor. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1654–1667, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22280

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. De Bellis MD Keshavan MS Clark DB Casey BJ Giedd JN Boring AM Frustaci K Ryan ND Developmental traumatology part II: brain development Biological Psychiatry 1999 45 10 1271 1284 10349033
  2. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders – Non-patient Edition (SCID-I/NP, 1/2007 revision 2007 New York, New York, USA Biometrics Research Department
  3. Green JG McLaughlin KA Berglund PA Gruber MJ Sampson NA Zaslavsky AM Kessler RC Childhood Adversities and Adult Psychiatric Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication I: Associations With First Onset of DSM-IV Disorders Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010 67 2 113 123 20124111 PMC2822662

Authors
Elton, A., Tripathi, S. P., Mletzko, T., Young, J., Cisler, J. M., James, G. A., & Kilts, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-24
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1654-1667
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2100818092
Cited by
119
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019999, T32DA022981)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR029883, UL1RR029884)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
child abuse, childhood adversity, inhibitory control, sex differences, response inhibition, ADHD symptoms, drug addiction risk, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, inferior frontal cortex, functional connectivity, effective connectivity, brain network reorganization, stop-signal task
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Task Performance and Analysis, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review