Cited by 71Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Neuroanatomical profiles of alexithymia dimensions and subtypes

Open access
Goerlich‐Dobre, Katharina Sophia, Votinov, Mikhail, Habel, Ute, Pripfl, Juergen, Lamm, Claus·2015·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Alexithymia, a major risk factor for a range of psychiatric and neurological disorders, has been recognized to comprise two dimensions, a cognitive dimension (difficulties identifying, analyzing, and verbalizing feelings) and an affective one (difficulties emotionalizing and fantasizing). Based on these dimensions, the existence of four distinct alexithymia subtypes has been proposed, but never empirically tested. In this study, 125 participants were assigned to four groups corresponding to the proposed alexithymia subtypes: Type I (impairment on both dimensions), Type II (impairment on the cognitive, but not the affective dimension), Type III (impairment on the affective, but not the cognitive dimension), and Lexithymics (no impairment on either dimension). By means of voxel-based morphometry, associations of the alexithymia dimensions and subtypes with gray and white matter volumes were analyzed. Type I and Type II alexithymia were characterized by gray matter volume reductions in the left amygdala and the thalamus. The cognitive dimension was further linked to volume reductions in the right amygdala, left posterior insula, precuneus, caudate, hippocampus, and parahippocampus. Type III alexithymia was marked by volume reduction in the MCC only, and the affective dimension was further characterized by larger sgACC volume. Moreover, individuals with the intermediate alexithymia Types II and III showed gray matter volume reductions in distinct regions, and had larger corpus callosum volumes compared to Lexithymics. These results substantiate the notion of a differential impact of the cognitive and affective alexithymia dimensions on brain morphology and provide evidence for separable neuroanatomical representations of the different alexithymia subtypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22879

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impairment in the affective and cognitive domains of alexithymia has been associated with different underlying neural atypicalities.

    “Impairment in the affective and cognitive domains has been associated, unsurprisingly, with different underlying neural atypicalities (Goerlich-Dobre et al., 2015).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Goerlich-Dobre et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 71

Authors
Goerlich‐Dobre, K. S., Votinov, M., Habel, U., Pripfl, J., & Lamm, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University 52074 Aachen Germany
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-19
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
3805-3818
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2109813510
Cited by
71
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (P22813-B09)
  • Österreichische Nationalbank (14350)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
alexithymia, gray matter volume, white matter volume, amygdala, thalamus, posterior insula, corpus callosum, brain structure, emotional awareness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Affective Symptoms, Brain, Cognition, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, White Matter, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review