The neurobiology of emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: amygdala downregulation via real‐time fMRI neurofeedback
Open accessAbstract
Amygdala dysregulation has been shown to be central to the pathophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) representing a critical treatment target. Here, amygdala downregulation was targeted using real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rt-fMRI-nf) in patients with PTSD, allowing us to examine further the regulation of emotional states during symptom provocation. Patients (n = 10) completed three sessions of rt-fMRI-nf with the instruction to downregulate activation in the amygdala, while viewing personalized trauma words. Amygdala downregulation was assessed by contrasting (a) regulate trials, with (b) viewing trauma words and not attempting to regulate. Training was followed by one transfer run not involving neurofeedback. Generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI) and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) analyses were also computed to explore task-based functional connectivity and causal structure, respectively. It was found that PTSD patients were able to successfully downregulate both right and left amygdala activation, showing sustained effects within the transfer run. Increased activation in the dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), regions related to emotion regulation, was observed during regulate as compared with view conditions. Importantly, activation in the PFC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, and the insula, were negatively correlated to PTSD dissociative symptoms in the transfer run. Increased functional connectivity between the amygdala- and both the dorsolateral and dorsomedial PFC was found during regulate, as compared with view conditions during neurofeedback training. Finally, our DCM analysis exploring directional structure suggested that amygdala downregulation involves both top-down and bottom-up information flow with regard to observed PFC-amygdala connectivity. This is the first demonstration of successful downregulation of the amygdala using rt-fMRI-nf in PTSD, which was critically sustained in a subsequent transfer run without neurofeedback, and corresponded to increased connectivity with prefrontal regions involved in emotion regulation during the intervention. Hum Brain Mapp 38:541-560, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A combined anatomical and functional approach for defining a target region is commonly implemented in rt-fMRI NF studies focusing on emotion regulation.
“A combined anatomical and functional approach for defining a target region is commonly implemented in rt-fMRI NF studies focusing on emotion regulation (Nicholson et al., 2017, Paret et al., 2014, Paret et al., 2016).”
From Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder (2020) · cites this paper as Nicholson et al., 2017
Nicholson et al. (2017) reported successful downregulation of the bilateral amygdala and increased connectivity with medial and lateral prefrontal control regions during regulation in ten individuals with PTSD.
“The authors report successful downregulation of the bilateral amygdala and increased connectivity with medial and lateral prefrontal control regions during regulation.”
From Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder (2020) · cites this paper as Nicholson et al. (2017)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 92 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Nicholson, A. A., Rabellino, D., Densmore, M., Frewen, P. A., Paret, C., Kluetsch, R., Schmahl, C., Théberge, J., Neufeld, R. W. J., McKinnon, M. C., Reiss, J. P., Jetly, R., & Lanius, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
- Canadian Armed Forces (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lanius, Ruth A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-20
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 541-560
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6866912
- OpenAlex
- W2521839929
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 34.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, real-time fMRI neurofeedback, emotion regulation, prefrontal cortex, dissociative symptoms, generalized psychophysiological interaction, dynamic causal modeling
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Oxygen, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Feedback, Sensory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review