Cited by 89Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Increased functional connectivity between the default mode and salience networks in unmedicated adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Default Mode and Salience Networks in OCD

Open access
Posner, Jonathan, Song, Inkyung, Lee, Seonjoo, Rodriguez, Carolyn I., Moore, Holly, Marsh, Rachel, Blair Simpson, H.·2017·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Deficits in attention have been implicated in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), yet their neurobiological bases are poorly understood. In unmedicated adults with OCD (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 32), they used resting state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) to examine functional connectivity between two neural networks associated with attentional processes: the default mode network (DMN) and the salience network (SN). They then used path analyses to examine putative relationships across three variables of interest: DMN-SN connectivity, attention, and OCD symptoms. In the OCD compared with healthy control participants, there was significantly reduced inverse connectivity between the anterior medial prefrontal cortex (amPFC) and the anterior insular cortex, regions within the DMN and SN, respectively. In OCD, reduced inverse DMN-SN connectivity was associated with both increased OCD symptom severity and decreased sustained attention. Path analyses were consistent with a potential mechanistic explanation: OCD symptoms are associated with an imbalance in DMN-SN networks that subserve attentional processes and this effect of OCD on DMN-SN connectivity is associated with decreased sustained attention. This work builds upon a growing literature suggesting that reduced inverse DMN-SN connectivity may represent a trans-diagnostic marker of attentional processes and suggests a potential mechanistic account of the relationship between OCD and attention. Reduced inverse DMN-SN connectivity may be an important target for treatment development to improve attention in individuals with OCD. Hum Brain Mapp 38:678-687, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23408

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Permutation testing (N=10,000) was used to test differences in network strength between OCD and healthy participants, controlling for age, gender, and scanner, with Bonferroni correction for 9 comparisons.

    “Finally, we used permutation testing(N=10,000) to test for differences in network strength between OCD and healthy participants(PBonferroni<0.05 for 9 comparisons), controlling for age, gender, and scanner(9,14,34).”
  • Prior work suggests overactivation of typical DMN regions during nonaffective cognitive tasks in adults with OCD and weaker anticorrelation between DMN and salience network than in healthy adults.

    “Prior findings from adults with OCD suggest overactivation of typical DMN regions during nonaffective cognitive tasks (33) and weakened anticorrelation between the DMN and salience network compared with healthy adults (34,35).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 89

Authors
Posner, J., Song, I., Lee, S., Rodriguez, C. I., Moore, H., Marsh, R., & Blair Simpson, H.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York New York
Corresponding author
Posner, Jonathan
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-23
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
678-687
ISSN
1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528109306
Cited by
89
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH091249, MH091555, MH093889)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, default mode network, salience network, functional connectivity, sustained attention, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, attention deficits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review