White matter microstructure in athletes with a history of concussion: Comparing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)
Open accessAbstract
Sport concussion is associated with disturbances in brain function in the absence of gross anatomical lesions, and may have long‐term health consequences. Diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods provide a powerful tool for investigating alterations in white matter microstructure reflecting the long‐term effects of concussion. In a previous study, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) showed that athletes with a history of concussion had elevated fractional anisotropy (FA) and reduced mean diffusivity (MD) parameters. To better understand these effects, this study compared DTI results to neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI), which was used to estimate the intracellular volume fraction ( V IC ) and orientation dispersion index (ODI). Sixty‐eight (68) varsity athletes were recruited, including 37 without a history of concussion and 31 with concussion >6 months prior to imaging. Univariate analyses showed elevated FA and decreased MD for concussed athletes, along with increased V IC and reduced ODI, indicating greater neurite density and coherence of neurite orientation within white matter. Multivariate analyses also showed that for athletes with a history of concussion, white matter regions with increased FA had increased V IC and decreased ODI, with greater effects among athletes who were imaged a longer time since their last concussion. These findings enhance our understanding of the relationship between the biophysics of water diffusion and concussion neurobiology for young, healthy adults. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4201–4211, 2017 . © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ODI decreases have previously been reported in mild TBI along with elevated FA, and were thought to reflect axonal regrowth, with greater changes among those with longer time since injury.
“ODI decreases have previously been reported in mild TBI along with elevated FA, and were thought to reflect axonal regrowth, with greater changes among those with longer time since injury.52”
From White Matter Changes after Neurobehavioral Therapy for Functional Seizures (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
In athletes at 9-120 months after their last concussion, increased NDI and decreased ODI are observed compared with controls.
“Interestingly, a study of the long-term effects of sports-related concussion reported increased NDI and decreased ODI in athletes at 9-120 months after their last concussion compared with controls”
From NODDI in clinical research (2020) · cites this paper as Churchill et al., 2017
Greater NDI and ODI effects after sports-related concussion are observed among those imaged after a longer period since their last concussion.
“with greater effects observed among those imaged after a longer period of time since their last concussion (Churchill et al., 2017).”
From NODDI in clinical research (2020) · cites this paper as Churchill et al., 2017
A few studies have adopted multi-parameter analysis with NODDI, although most have been limited to combinations with other dMRI measures.
“A few studies have adopted this type of multi-parameter analysis with NODDI (Andica et al., 2020;Churchill et al., 2019Churchill et al., , 2017)), although most have been limited to combinations with other dMRI measures.”
From NODDI in clinical research (2020) · cites this paper as Churchill et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Churchill, N. W., Caverzasi, E., Graham, S. J., Hutchison, M. G., & Schweizer, T. A.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-29
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4201-4211
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6866962
- OpenAlex
- W2620311529
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defence Research and Development Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Keywords
- sports-related concussion, white matter microstructure, diffusion tensor imaging, NODDI, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, intracellular volume fraction, orientation dispersion index, athletes
- MeSH terms
- Athletic Injuries, Brain, Brain Concussion, Female, Humans, Male, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Least-Squares Analysis, Neurites, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Athletes, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review