Intrinsic functional connectivity variance and state‐specific under‐connectivity in autism
Open accessAbstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition associated with altered brain connectivity. Previous neuroimaging research demonstrates inconsistent results, particularly in studies of functional connectivity in ASD. Typically, these inconsistent findings are results of studies using static measures of resting‐state functional connectivity. Recent work has demonstrated that functional brain connections are dynamic, suggesting that static connectivity metrics fail to capture nuanced time‐varying properties of functional connections in the brain. Here we used a dynamic functional connectivity approach to examine the differences in the strength and variance of dynamic functional connections between individuals with ASD and healthy controls (HCs). The variance of dynamic functional connections was defined as the respective standard deviations of the dynamic functional connectivity strength across time. We utilized a large multicenter dataset of 507 male subjects (209 with ASD and 298 HC, from 6 to 36 years old) from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) to identify six distinct whole‐brain dynamic functional connectivity states. Analyses demonstrated greater variance of widespread long‐range dynamic functional connections in ASD (P < 0.05, NBS method) and weaker dynamic functional connections in ASD (P < 0.05, NBS method) within specific whole‐brain connectivity states. Hypervariant dynamic connections were also characterized by weaker connectivity strength in ASD compared with HC. Increased variance of dynamic functional connections was also related to ASD symptom severity (ADOS total score) (P < 0.05), and was most prominent in connections related to the medial superior frontal gyrus and temporal pole. These results demonstrate that greater intraindividual dynamic variance is a potential biomarker of ASD. Hum Brain Mapp 38:5740–5755, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A set of core diagnostic features of ASD (covering social interaction, communication and flexible or sensory behaviour) can be reliably identified by trained clinicians.
“Although substantial heterogeneity exists between and within individuals across development, a set of core diagnostic features of ASD (covering social interaction, communication and flexible or sensory behaviour) can be reliably identified by trained clinicians 119,120”
From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [119]
The Materials and Methods section on ASD symptom severity lists ADOS and ADI-R scores for communication, social behaviour, and restricted and repetitive behaviour. Our copy does not establish that trained clinicians can reliably identify these features, and the cited passage does not address sensory behaviour. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn 6- to 36-year-olds within ABIDE, greater variance of widespread long-range dynamic functional connections in ASD was reported and linked with symptom severity indexed by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule.
“Focusing on functional connectivity variance in 6–36 year-olds within ABIDE, greater variance of widespread long-range dynamic functional connections in ASD was reported, and linked with symptom severity indexed by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) (118).”
From Brain Mechanisms Supporting Flexible Cognition and Behavior in Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [118]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Chen, H., Nomi, J. S., Uddin, L. Q., Duan, X., & Chen, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- University of Miami (US)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5740-5755
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC5783325
- OpenAlex
- W2744921996
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of China (61533006, 61673089)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107549)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, dynamic functional connectivity, resting-state functional connectivity, ASD severity, medial superior frontal gyrus, temporal pole, biomarkers, network-based statistics
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Rest, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Least-Squares Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review