Cited by 66Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlTactile and Sensory Interactions

Multilevel convergence of interoceptive impairments in hypertension: new evidence of disrupted body–brain interactions

Open access
Yoris, Adrián, Abrevaya, Sofía, Esteves, Sol, Salamone, Paula, Lori, Nicolás, Martorell, Miguel, Legaz, Agustina, Alifano, Florencia +5 more·2018·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Interoception, the sensing of visceral body signals, involves an interplay between neural and autonomic mechanisms. Clinical studies into this domain have focused on patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders, showing that damage to relevant brain mechanisms can variously alter interoceptive functions. However, the association between peripheral cardiac‐system alterations and neurocognitive markers of interoception remains poorly understood. To bridge this gap, we examined multidimensional neural markers of interoception in patients with early stage of hypertensive disease (HTD) and healthy controls. Strategically, we recruited only HTD patients without cognitive impairment (as shown by neuropsychological tests), brain atrophy (as assessed with voxel‐based morphometry), or white matter abnormalities (as evidenced by diffusion tensor imaging analysis). Interoceptive domains were assessed through (a) a behavioral heartbeat detection task; (b) measures of the heart‐evoked potential (HEP), an electrophysiological cortical signature of attention to cardiac signals; and (c) neuroimaging recordings (MRI and fMRI) to evaluate anatomical and functional connectivity properties of key interoceptive regions (namely, the insula and the anterior cingulate cortex). Relative to controls, patients exhibited poorer interoceptive performance and reduced HEP modulations, alongside an abnormal association between interoceptive performance and both the volume and functional connectivity of the above regions. Such results suggest that peripheral cardiac‐system impairments can be associated with abnormal behavioral and neurocognitive signatures of interoception. More generally, our findings indicate that interoceptive processes entail bidirectional influences between the cardiovascular and the central nervous systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23933

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 170 · Cited by 66

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anderson, J. L. R., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2007). Non-linear registra- tion, aka Spatial normalisation FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. FMRIB Analysis Group of the University of Oxford, 2.
  2. Yoris, A., García, A. M., Salamone, P., Sedeño, L., García-Cordero, I., & Ib añez, A. (in press). Cardiac interoception in neurological conditions and its relevance for dimensional approaches. In: TSAKIRIS, M. & DE PREESTER, H. E. (eds.) The Interoceptive Basis of the Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Authors
Yoris, A., Abrevaya, S., Esteves, S., Salamone, P., Lori, N., Martorell, M., Legaz, A., Alifano, F., Petroni, A., Sánchez, R., Sedeño, L., García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Favaloro University (AR)
  • Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Neuroscience (LANEN) INECO Neurosciences Oroño, Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University Rosario Argentina
  • Metabolic and Arterial Hypertension Unit Favaloro Foundation Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-21
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
1563-1581
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2779532603
Cited by
66
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • CONICET
  • CONICYT (1170010)
  • FonCyT (2012‐0412, 2012‐1309)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
interoception, hypertension, heartbeat detection, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, functional connectivity, brain volume, brain-body interaction, cardiovascular system, autonomic function
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Heart, Humans, Hypertension, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Organ Size, Multilevel Analysis, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Interoception, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review