Multilevel convergence of interoceptive impairments in hypertension: new evidence of disrupted body–brain interactions
Open accessAbstract
Interoception, the sensing of visceral body signals, involves an interplay between neural and autonomic mechanisms. Clinical studies into this domain have focused on patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders, showing that damage to relevant brain mechanisms can variously alter interoceptive functions. However, the association between peripheral cardiac‐system alterations and neurocognitive markers of interoception remains poorly understood. To bridge this gap, we examined multidimensional neural markers of interoception in patients with early stage of hypertensive disease (HTD) and healthy controls. Strategically, we recruited only HTD patients without cognitive impairment (as shown by neuropsychological tests), brain atrophy (as assessed with voxel‐based morphometry), or white matter abnormalities (as evidenced by diffusion tensor imaging analysis). Interoceptive domains were assessed through (a) a behavioral heartbeat detection task; (b) measures of the heart‐evoked potential (HEP), an electrophysiological cortical signature of attention to cardiac signals; and (c) neuroimaging recordings (MRI and fMRI) to evaluate anatomical and functional connectivity properties of key interoceptive regions (namely, the insula and the anterior cingulate cortex). Relative to controls, patients exhibited poorer interoceptive performance and reduced HEP modulations, alongside an abnormal association between interoceptive performance and both the volume and functional connectivity of the above regions. Such results suggest that peripheral cardiac‐system impairments can be associated with abnormal behavioral and neurocognitive signatures of interoception. More generally, our findings indicate that interoceptive processes entail bidirectional influences between the cardiovascular and the central nervous systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A validated heartbeat detection (HBD) task was used.
“A validated heartbeat detection (HBD) task was used,18, 19, 20,32, 33, 34,50 where participants completed two 2-min blocks of interoception or exteroception.”
From Altered spatiotemporal brain dynamics of interoception in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 170 · Cited by 66
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Anderson, J. L. R., Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2007). Non-linear registra- tion, aka Spatial normalisation FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. FMRIB Analysis Group of the University of Oxford, 2.
- Yoris, A., García, A. M., Salamone, P., Sedeño, L., García-Cordero, I., & Ib añez, A. (in press). Cardiac interoception in neurological conditions and its relevance for dimensional approaches. In: TSAKIRIS, M. & DE PREESTER, H. E. (eds.) The Interoceptive Basis of the Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Authors
- Yoris, A., Abrevaya, S., Esteves, S., Salamone, P., Lori, N., Martorell, M., Legaz, A., Alifano, F., Petroni, A., Sánchez, R., Sedeño, L., García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Favaloro University (AR)
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Neuroscience (LANEN) INECO Neurosciences Oroño, Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University Rosario Argentina
- Metabolic and Arterial Hypertension Unit Favaloro Foundation Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12-21
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1563-1581
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6866355
- OpenAlex
- W2779532603
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 170
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- CONICET
- CONICYT (1170010)
- FonCyT (2012‐0412, 2012‐1309)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- interoception, hypertension, heartbeat detection, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, functional connectivity, brain volume, brain-body interaction, cardiovascular system, autonomic function
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Heart, Humans, Hypertension, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Organ Size, Multilevel Analysis, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Interoception, Gray Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review