The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Involve Commuter Students in Learning?
Abstract
Data show that students reap considerable benefits from efforts to increase their involvement in learning, and these benefits are ones that commuter students richly deserve.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous research has shown that a sense of community and belonging can be fostered by increased student interaction with peers and teaching staff (Callcott et al., 2014; Gieg et al., 2016; Jacoby, 2000; Tinto, 2012).”
From Building a sense of belonging among tertiary commuter students: The Monash Non-Residential Colleges program (2017) · cites this paper as Jacoby, 2000
In the citing paper
“Such involvement may therefore be a crucial catalyst in generating a sense of belonging at university for commuting students, many of whom contend with a myriad of issues that limit, or inhibit, engagement in their university studies (Jacoby, 2000; Tinto, 1993).”
From Building a sense of belonging among tertiary commuter students: The Monash Non-Residential Colleges program (2017) · cites this paper as Jacoby, 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- American College Personnel Association, 1994, The Student Learning Imperative: Implications for Student Affairs
- Angelo T. A., 1993, A Teacher's Dozen: Fourteen General Findings from Research That Can Reform Classroom Teaching and Assessment and Improve Learning, American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 13, 3
- Association of American Colleges, 1988, A New Vitality in General Education
- Astin A. W., 1985, Achieving Educational Excellence
- 10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672 · DOI
- Baxter Magolda M., 1999, Higher Education Trends for the Next Century: A Research Agenda for Student Success
- Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, 1998, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities
- Boyer E. L., 1988, College: The Undergraduate Experience in America
- Chaffee E. E., 1987, Key Resources on Higher Education Governance, Management, and Leadership
- Chickering A. W., 1987, Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
- El‐Khawas E., 1996, Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession
- Gabelnick F., 1990, New Directions for Teaching and Learning
- Horn L. J., 1998, Profile of Undergraduates in U. S. Postsecondary Education Institutions: 1995‐96
- Johnson D. W. Johnson R. T. andSmith K. A.“Cooperative Learning Returns to College.”Change July/Aug.1998 pp.27–35.
- Joint Task Force on Student Learning, 1998, Powerful Partnerships: A Shared Responsibility for Learning
- Keeling R. P., 1999, A New Definition of College Emerges: Everything That Happens to … a (Newly Defined) Student, in the Context of a Noisy Visual “Datascape”, NASPA Forum, 20, 4
- Major C., 1998, What is Problem‐Based Learning?, PBL Insight, 1, 5
- Maslow A. H., Toward a Psychology of Being, 10.1037/10793-000 · DOI
- Newton F. B., 1996, Contributing to Learning: The Role of Student Affairs. New Directions for Student Services
Cited by
Fernandes, A., Ford, A., Rayner, G., & Pretorius, L. (2017) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.v8i2.380 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacoby, B.
- Corresponding author
- Jacoby, Barbara
- ORCID
- Jacoby, Barbara
- Venue
- New Directions for Higher Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 2000
- Issue
- 109
- Pages
- 3-12
- ISSN
- 0271-0560 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0741
- OpenAlex
- W2111757507
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Directions for Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- commuter students, student involvement, student engagement, student learning, non-traditional students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Involve Commuter Students in Learning? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/he.10901
- The paper
- Jacoby, B. (2000). Why Involve Commuter Students in Learning? New Directions for Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.10901
