The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Academic Advising
Abstract
Because retention improves the academic foundation of the institution, most colleges and universities have approved the expansion of advising centers in the last twenty years.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Student time constraints coupled with high advisor-to-advisee ratios means students may struggle to find open appointments to address time sensitive matters.
“Student time constraints coupled with high advisor-to-advisee ratios means students may struggle to find open appointments to address time sensitive matters (Tuttle, 2000).”
From Thx 4 the msg: Assessing the Impact of Texting on Student Engagement and Persistence (2022) · cites this paper as Tuttle, 2000
Text messaging may aid advisors in time management by reducing the need for one-on-one appointments, as advisor-to-advisee ratios continue to rise.
“Additionally, text messaging may aid advisors in time management by reducing the need for one-on-one appointments, as advisor-to-advisee ratios continue to rise (Tippetts, et al., 2021; Tuttle, 2000).”
From Thx 4 the msg: Assessing the Impact of Texting on Student Engagement and Persistence (2022) · cites this paper as Tuttle, 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- O'Banion T., 1972, An Academic Advising Model, Junior College Journal, 42, 62
- 10.12930/0271-9517-11.1.5 · DOI
- 10.2307/369045 · DOI
- Chickering A. W., 1987, Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 39, 3
- Crookston B. B., 1972, A Developmental View of Academic Advising as Teaching, Journal of College Student Personnel, 13, 12
- Glennen R. E., 1995, Academic Advising as a Comprehensive Process
- 10.12930/0271-9517-17.1.15 · DOI
- 10.12930/0271-9517-18.1.6 · DOI
- Habley W. R., 1988, The Status and Future of Academic Advising: Problems and Promise
- Habley W. R., 1998, Current Practices in Academic Advising: Final Report on ACT's Fifth National Survey of Academic Advising
- Johnson I. H., 1996, Leveling the Playing Field: Promoting Academic Success for Students of Color. New Directions for Student Services
- 10.12930/0271-9517-1.1.7 · DOI
- 10.12930/0271-9517-9.1.63 · DOI
- National Academic Advising Association, 1999, NACADA Demographic Information, August 18, 1999
- Noel L., 1985, Increasing Student Retention: Effective Programs and Practices for Reducing the Dropout Rate
- Pascarella E., 1991, How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research
- Rudolph F., 1962, The American College and University: A History
- 10.12930/0271-9517-14.2.92 · DOI
- Tinto V., 1993, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
- 10.12930/0271-9517-1.2.1 · DOI
- Veysey L. R., 1965, The Emergence of the American University, 10.7208/chicago/9780226841854.001.0001 · DOI
- Winston R. B., 1984, Developmental Academic Advising: Addressing Students' Educational, Career, and Personal Needs
- Wright D. J., 1987, Responding to the Needs of Today's Minority Students. New Directions for Student Services
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thx 4 the msg: Assessing the Impact of Texting on Student Engagement and Persistence
Tippetts, M. M., Davis, B., Nalbone, S., & Zick, C. D. (2022) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-022-09678-8 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuttle, K. N.
- Corresponding author
- Tuttle, Kathryn Nemeth
- Venue
- New Directions for Higher Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 2000
- Issue
- 111
- Pages
- 15-24
- ISSN
- 0271-0560 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0741
- OpenAlex
- W4248649105
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Directions for Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
- Keywords
- academic advising, student retention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
