CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 364Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non‐censored cost‐effectiveness data

Willan, Andrew R., Briggs, Andrew H., Hoch, Jeffrey S.·2004·Health Economics
DOI 10.1002/hec.843
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The current interest in undertaking cost‐effectiveness analyses alongside clinical trials has lead to the increasing availability of patient‐level data on both the costs and effectiveness of intervention. In a recent paper, we show how cost‐effectiveness analysis can be undertaken in a regression framework. In the current paper we develop a direct regression approach to cost‐effectiveness analysis by proposing the use of a system of seemingly unrelated regression equations to provide a more general method for prognostic factor adjustment with emphasis on sub‐group analysis. This more general method can be used in either an incremental cost‐effectiveness or an incremental net‐benefit approach, and does not require that the set of independent variables for costs and effectiveness be the same. Furthermore, the method can exhibit efficiency gains over unrelated ordinary least squares regression. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.843

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mullahy J, 1994, Valuing Health Care, 149
  2. 10.1002/hec.4730030505 · DOI
  3. Greene WH, 1993, Econometric Analysis, 486

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 364

Related

Metadata

Authors
Willan, A. R., Briggs, A. H., & Hoch, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Willan, Andrew R.
ORCID
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12-15
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
461-475
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
DOI
10.1002/hec.843
OpenAlex
W2069086045
Cited by
364
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
cost-effectiveness analysis, covariate adjustment, subgroup analysis, seemingly unrelated regression, individual patient data, incremental cost-effectiveness, incremental net benefit, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Canada, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Models, Statistical, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review