Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: One‐year follow‐up

Pauloski, Barbara Roa, Logemann, Jerilyn A., Rademaker, Alfred W., McConnel, Fred M. S., Stein, David, Beery, Quinter, Johnson, Jonas, Heiser, Mary Anne, Cardinale, Salvatore, Shedd, Donald, Graner, Darlene, Cook, Barbara, Milianti, Frank, Collins, Sharon, Baker, Theresa·1994·Head & Neck

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the speech and swallowing function of surgically treated oral cancer patients improves between 1 month and 1 year after surgery. Methods. Speech and swallowing performances were assessed for 28 men and 10 women preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively following a standardized protocol. Speech tasks included an audio recording of a brief conversation and of a standard articulation test; swallowing function was examined using videofluoroscopy. Data were also collected on the number and duration of speech/ swallowing therapy sessions, as well as the amount and duration of radiotherapy. Results. Statistical analyses revealed that the speech and swallowing function of surgically treated oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients did not improve progressively between 1 and 12 months postsurgery; the level of functioning that these patients demonstrated at the 1‐ and 3‐month posthealing evaluations was characteristic of their status at 1 year after surgery. Conclusion. The lack of improvement between 1 and 12 months postsurgery may be related to the relatively small amount of therapy that these patients received during that period. Several outcome variables worsened significantly at the 6‐month evaluation; the reversal of function at the 6‐month evaluation point could be the effect of postoperative radiotherapy, because irradiated and nonirradiated patients differed in their pattern of recovery on oropharyngeal swallow efficiency and several speech variables. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.2880160404

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Pauloski, B. R., Logemann, J. A., Rademaker, A. W., McConnel, F. M. S., Stein, D., Beery, Q., Johnson, J., Heiser, M. A., Cardinale, S., Shedd, D., Graner, D., Cook, B., Milianti, F., Collins, S., & Baker, T.
Venue
Head & Neck
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-07
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
313-322
ISSN
  • 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0347
OpenAlex
W2055496705
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: One‐year follow‐up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hed.2880160404
The paper
Pauloski, B. R., Logemann, J. A., Rademaker, A. W., McConnel, F. M. S., Stein, D., Beery, Q., Johnson, J., Heiser, M. A., Cardinale, S., Shedd, D., Graner, D., Cook, B., Milianti, F., Collins, S., & Baker, T. (1994). Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: One‐year follow‐up. Head & Neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880160404

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.