Cited by 94Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research

Autoantibodies against nuclear envelope-associated proteins in primary biliary cirrhosis

Lozano, Francisco, Parés, Albert, Borche, Luis, Plana, Montserrat, Gallart, Teresa, Rodés, Joan, Vives, Jordi·1988·Hepatology

Abstract

An antinuclear immunofluorescence pattern displaying a thin ring confined to the nuclear envelope was assessed in sera from 38 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and in sera from a control group of 277 patients with other antinuclear antibody-positive diseases. This rim-like antinuclear reactivity was present in sera from 20 primary biliary cirrhosis patients (52.6%) but in only two patients from the control group (0.7%) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, this autoantibody was present in three of four primary biliary cirrhosis patients without antimitochondrial antibodies. Presence of this rim-like pattern in primary biliary cirrhosis did not correlate with the presence of associated autoimmune diseases nor with other clinical, biochemical, nor histological features of the disease. The antigenic specificity of sera displaying this antinuclear immunofluorescence pattern was characterized by Western blot analysis using an antigenic extract containing nuclear envelope proteins purified from rat liver. Sixteen of the 20 positive sera showed a common pattern of reactivity with a set of nuclear envelope-associated proteins approximately 200 kD in size. In conclusion, sera from primary biliary cirrhosis patients showing a rim-like fluorescent nuclear pattern have antinuclear autoantibodies that react specifically with components of the nuclear envelope. The high specificity of these new autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis indicate that they might be a serological marker of the disease, particularly useful in patients without antimitochondrial antibodies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.1840080438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 94

Authors
Lozano, F., Parés, A., Borche, L., Plana, M., Gallart, T., Rodés, J., & Vives, J.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Lozano, Francisco
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1988-07
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
930-938
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045417479
Cited by
94
References
28
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, autoantibodies, nuclear envelope proteins, antimitochondrial antibodies, serological markers, autoantibody specificity
MeSH terms
Antibody Specificity, Autoantibodies, Female, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Immunoassay, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Membrane Proteins, Middle Aged, Nuclear Envelope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review