Cited by 178Liver physiology and pathologyOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Depressed Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy of Germ–Free, Athymic and Lipopolysaccharide–Resistant Mice

Open access
Cornell, Robert P., Liljequist, Barbara L., Bartizal, Kenneth F.·1990·Hepatology

Abstract

A hypothesis has been proposed by this laboratory that endogenous gut–derived lipopolysaccharide is responsible for systemic endotoxemia in animals with acute liver injury particularly after partial (67%) hepatectomy. Systemic lipopolysaccharide and possibly fibrin aggregates or tissue debris then elicit release of cytokines from phagocytizing macrophages and/or monocytes that may be essential for normal liver regeneration. To test this hypothesis liver regeneration was assessed in germ–free euthymic mice that lack the gram–negative bacterial source of lipopolysaccharide, as well as being deficient in lymphoid tissue and relatively resistant to endotoxin. To complement the germ–free animals, conventional athymic nude BALB/c mice and conventional lipopolysaccharide–resistant C3H/HeJ mice were also examined. Liver regeneration, quantified by [3 H] thymidine incorporation into hepatic DNA after partial hepatectomy was performed on mice anesthetized with ether, was significantly depressed in germ–free euthymic and conventional athymic BALB/c mice and delayed in conventional lipopolysaccharide–resistant C3H/HeJ mice, as compared with conventional control BALB/c and C3H/HeN animals. Pretreatment of conventional euthymic control mice with lipopolysaccharide 24 hr before surgery significantly stimulated hepatic DNA synthesis after 67% liver resection. Germ–free euthymic, conventional athymic, and conventional lipopolysaccharide–resistant mice pretreated with endotoxin did not manifest significant stimulation of liver regeneration. Evidence is reviewed that cytokine release in response to endotoxin was depressed in germ–free euthymic, conventional athymic, and conventional lipopolysaccharide–resistant mice as compared with conventional euthymic controls. The inability to release cytokines in response to gut–derived endotoxin in the three murine strains studied or the paucity of endogenous lipopolysaccharide in germ–free animals may explain the significant depression or delay of liver regeneration as compared with conventional euthymic control mice.(HEPATOLOGY 1990;11:916–922.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.1840110603

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regaining liver mass despite deficient DNA synthesis is a general phenomenon in animal models defective in liver regeneration, most likely resulting from hypertrophy of hepatocytes despite G1/S arrest.

    “Regaining liver mass despite deficient DNA synthesis is a general phenomenon in animal models that are defective in liver regeneration, which most likely results from hypertrophy of hepatocytes despite G1/S arrest (3”
  • In the setting of PHx, both HGF and gut bacterial endotoxins mimicking LPS participate in the regenerative process.

    “in the setting of PHx, both HGF [12] and gut bacterial endotoxins (mimicking LPS) participate in the regenerative process [25].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 178

Authors
Cornell, R. P., Liljequist, B. L., & Bartizal, K. F.
Corresponding author
Cornell, Robert P.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1990-06
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
916-922
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114838652
Cited by
178
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
liver regeneration, partial hepatectomy, endotoxemia, germ-free mice, nude mice, C3H/HeJ mice, cytokine production, macrophages, monocytes, hepatic DNA synthesis, acute liver injury, gut-derived endotoxin
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, DNA Replication, Drug Resistance, Endotoxins, Germ-Free Life, Glucagon, Hepatectomy, Insulin, Lipopolysaccharides, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Nude, Portal Vein, Salmonella enteritidis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review