Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Murine liver allograft transplantation: Tolerance and donor cell chimerism

Open access
Qian, Shigwang, Demetris, Anthony J., Murase, Noriko, Rao, Abdul S., Fung, John J., Starzl, Thomas E.·1994·Hepatology

Abstract

Nonarterialized orthotopic liver transplantation with no immunosuppression was performed in 13 mouse-strain combinations. Two strain combinations with major histocompatibility complex class I and class II and minor histocompatibility complex disparity had 20% and 33% survival of more than 100 days, but the other 11 combinations, including four that were fully allogeneic and all with only class I, class II or minor disparities, yielded 45% to 100% survival of more than 100 days. Long-living recipients permanently accepted donor-strain heterotopic hearts transplanted on the same day or donor-strain skin 3 mo after liver transplantation, in spite of detectable antidonor in vitro activity with mixed lymphocyte reaction and cellmediated lymphocytotoxicity testing (split tolerance). In further donor-specific experiments, liver grafts were not rejected by presensitized major histocompatibility complex class I-disparate recipients and they protected donor-strain skin grafts from second set (or any) rejection. Less frequently, liver transplantation rescued rejecting skin grafts placed 1 wk earlier in major histocompatibility complex class I, class II and minor histocompatibility complex, class II or minor histocompatibility complex-disparate strain combinations. Donor-derived leukocyte migration to the central lymphoid organs occurred within 1 to 2 hr after liver transplantation in all animals examined, persisted in the surviving animals until they were killed (>375 days), and was demonstrated with double-immunolabeling to be multilineage. The relation of these findings to so-called hepatic tolerogenicity and to tolerance in general is discussed. (Hepatology 1994;19:916-924.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.1840190418

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Qian, S., Demetris, A. J., Murase, N., Rao, A. S., Fung, J. J., & Starzl, T. E.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1994-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
916-924
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100215924
Cited by
451
References
30
FWCI
35.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Murine liver allograft transplantation: Tolerance and donor cell chimerism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.1840190418
The paper
Qian, S., Demetris, A. J., Murase, N., Rao, A. S., Fung, J. J., & Starzl, T. E. (1994). Murine liver allograft transplantation: Tolerance and donor cell chimerism. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840190418

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.