Paradoxical effects of short- and long-term interleukin-6 exposure on liver injury and repair
Abstract
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of liver regeneration and repair that is also elevated in chronic liver diseases, including fatty liver of obesity and cirrhosis. IL-6 has been reported both to delay and accelerate liver regeneration. We examined the effects on liver injury and regeneration of a continuous administration of exogenous IL-6 to mice by injection of an IL-6-expressing CHO-cell line in athymic nude mice and by osmotic mini-pump delivery of recombinant murine IL-6. Short-term IL-6 administration (1-2 days) accelerated early recovery of liver mass, whereas more long-term administration (5-7 days) markedly impaired liver regeneration. Similarly, short-term IL-6 treatment increased hepatic resistance to the lethal effects of the Fas agonist Jo-2, but on more prolonged IL-6 exposure the Jo-2 resistance vanished. IL-6 administration initially induced expression of the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, correlating with protection against Fas-mediated cell death. More prolonged IL-6 administration, however, resulted in marked induction of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax. This result coincided with increased activation of the type II or intrinsic, mitochondrial path to cell death, manifested by increased caspase-9 activation and increased cytochrome c release after Jo-2 exposure. These data demonstrate that IL-6 can function acutely to improve hepatic regeneration and repair, but that more chronic exposure not only abolishes the protective effects of IL-…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-term exposure of the liver to IL-6 is injurious.
“long-term exposure of the liver to IL-6 has paradoxically been demonstrated to be injurious [30]”
From Synthesis of IL-6 by Hepatocytes Is a Normal Response to Common Hepatic Stimuli (2014) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Jin, X., Zimmers, T. A., Perez, E. A., Pierce, R. H., Zhang, Z., & Koniaris, L. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koniaris, Leonidas G.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 474-484
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090165963
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (NIDDK 62314)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-6360301)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- interleukin-6, liver regeneration, liver injury, chronic liver disease, Fas-mediated apoptosis, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Bax, caspase-9, cytochrome c release, mitochondrial apoptosis, liver failure, liver cirrhosis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cricetulus, Female, Cricetinae, Hepatectomy, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Nude, Mitochondria, Liver, Recombinant Proteins, Wound Healing, Interleukin-6, CHO Cells, Apoptosis, fas Receptor, Caspases, bcl-X Protein, bcl-Associated Death Protein, Mice, Caspase 9
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review