Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,722

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis

Open access
Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe, Sanyal, Arun J., Grace, Norman D., Carey, William·2007·Hepatology

Abstract

This guideline has been approved by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American College of Gastroenterology and represents the position of both associations. PreambleThese recommendations provide a data-supported approach to the management of patients with varices and variceal hemorrhage.They are based on the following: (1) formal review and analysis of the recently published world literature on the topic (Medline search); (2) several consensus conferences among experts; (3) the American College of Physicians' Manual for Assessing Health Practices and Designing Practice Guidelines 1 ; (4) guideline policies, including the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases' Policy Statement on Development and Use of Practice Guidelines and the American Gastroenterological Association's Policy Statement on the Use of Medical Practice Guidelines 2 ; and (5) the authors' years of experience caring for patients with cirrhosis and varices.Intended for use by healthcare providers, these recommendations suggest preferred approaches to the diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive aspects of care.As with other practice guidelines, this guideline is not intended to replace clinical judgment but rather to provide general guidelines applicable to the majority of patients.They are intended to be flexible, in contrast to standards of care, which are inflexible policies designed to be followed in every case.Specific recommendations are based on relevant published information.To more fully characterize the quality of evidence supporting recommendations, the Practice Guidelines Committee of the AASLD requires a class (reflecting benefit versus risk) and level (assessing strength or certainty) of evidence to be assigned and reported with each recommendation (Table 1, adapted from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association Practice Guidelines 3,4 ).When little or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts.Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear.Clinical considerations may justify a course of action that differs from these recommendations.These recommendations are fully endorsed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American College of Gastroenterology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.21907

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,722

Metadata

Authors
Garcia-Tsao, G., Sanyal, A. J., Grace, N. D., & Carey, W.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2007-09
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
922-938
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006916640
Cited by
1,722
References
1
FWCI
44.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.21907
The paper
Garcia-Tsao, G., Sanyal, A. J., Grace, N. D., & Carey, W. (2007). Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21907

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.