Cited by 1,251Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score and the Histopathologic Diagnosis in NAFLD: Distinct Clinicopathologic Meanings §Δ

Open access
Brunt, Elizabeth M., Kleiner, David E., Wilson, Laura A., Belt, Patricia, Neuschwander-Tetri, Brent A.·2011·Hepatology

Abstract

The diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is defined by the presence and pattern of specific histological abnormalities on liver biopsy. A separate system of scoring the features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) called the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) was developed as a tool to measure changes in NAFLD during therapeutic trials. However, some studies have used threshold values of the NAS, specifically NAS ≥5, as a surrogate for the histologic diagnosis of NASH. To evaluate whether this unintended use of the NAS is valid, biopsy and clinical data from the 976 adults in NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) studies were reviewed. Biopsies were evaluated centrally by the NASH CRN Pathology Committee. Definite steatohepatitis (SH) was diagnosed in 58.1%, borderline SH in 19.5% and “not SH” in 22%. The NAS was ≥5 in 50% and ≤4 in 49%; in this cohort only 75% of biopsies with definite SH had an NAS ≥5, whereas 28% of borderline SH and 7% of “not SH” biopsies had NAS ≥5. Of biopsies with an NAS ≥5, 86% had SH and 3% “not SH”. NAS ≤4 did not indicate benign histology; 29% had SH and only 42% had “not SH.” Higher values of the NAS were associated with higher levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, whereas the diagnosis of SH was associated with features of the metabolic syndrome. Conclusion: The diagnosis of definite SH or the absence of SH based on evaluation of patterns as well as individual lesions on liver biopsies does not always correlate with threshold values of the semiquantitative NAS. Clinical trials and observational studies should take these different performance characteristics into account. (Hepatology 2011)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.24127

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bone marrow chimeric mice were used to avoid potential influence of brain-expressed FABP7 on HFHC diet intake.

    “To establish a MASH model, bone marrow chimeric mice were fed an HFHC diet (Figure S2A), considering the potential influence of brain-expressed FABP7 on HFHC diet intake [19].”

    From FABP7 in Hepatic Macrophages Promotes Fibroblast Activation and CD4 <sup>+</sup> T‐Cell Migration by Regulating M2 Polarization During Liver Fibrosis (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Materials and Methods section describes review of adult human liver biopsies, not a mouse feeding experiment. Searches of our copy for bone marrow chimeric mice, FABP7, and HFHC diet intake found no passage addressing the claimed reason for using the mice; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 9 · Cited by 1,251

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Kleiner DE Brunt EM Van Natta M Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Hepatology 2005 41 6 1313 1321 15915461
  2. [2]Brunt EM Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Definition and pathology Seminars in Liver Disease 2001 21 1 3 16 11296695
  3. [3]Panel. Executive summary of the third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA 2001 285 2486 2497 11368702
  4. [4]Muniyappa R Lee S Chen H Quon MJ Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008 294 1 E15 E26 17957034
  5. [5]Eeuschwander-Tetri BA Fatty liver and the metabolic syndrome Current Opinions in Gastroenterology 2007 23 193 198 17268250
  6. [6]Brunt EM Grading and staging the histopathologcial lesions of chronic hepatitis: The Knodell histology activity index and beyond Hepatology 2000 31 241 246 10613753
  7. [7]Lackner C Gogg-Kammerer M Zatloukal K Stumptner C Brunt EM Denk H Ballooned hepatocytes in steatohepatitis: The value of keratin immunohistochemistry for diagnosis Journal of Hepatology 2008 48 821 828 18329127
  8. [9]Wieckowska A Zein NN Yerian LM Lopez AR McCullough AJ Feldstein AE In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Hepatology 2006 44 27 33 16799979

Authors
Brunt, E. M., Kleiner, D. E., Wilson, L. A., Belt, P., & Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Brunt, Elizabeth M.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2011-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
810-820
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W90736706
Cited by
1,251
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 35
FWCI
23.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK061730, U01DK061718, U01DK061728, U01DK061731, U01DK061732, grants U01DK061718, U01DK061728, U01DK061731, U01DK061732, U01DK061734, U01DK061737, U01DK061738, U01DK061730, U01DK061713, P30DK056341, U01DK061731, U01DK061713, U01DK061728, U01DK061737, U01DK061732, U01DK061734, U01DK061718, U01DK061738)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024131, UL1RR024989, M01RR000750, UL1RR025014, M01RR020359, M01RR000065, M01RR000188, M01 RR-00188, UL1RR025741, M01RR000827)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, NAFLD activity score, histopathological diagnosis, liver biopsy, diagnostic thresholds, metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Biopsy, Fatty Liver, Female, Humans, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review