Cited by 185Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Patient-reported barriers are associated with lower hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance rates in patients with cirrhosis

Open access
Farvardin, Sherean, Patel, Jaimin, Khambaty, Maleka, Yerokun, Olutola A., Mok, Huram, Tiro, Jasmin A., Yopp, Adam C., Parikh, Neehar D. +2 more·2017·Hepatology

Abstract

Over 20% of patients with cirrhosis are nonadherent with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance recommendations; however, few studies have evaluated the impact of patient‐level factors on surveillance receipt. We characterized the association between HCC surveillance receipt and patient knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers in a racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis followed at a large urban hospital were invited to complete a survey about HCC surveillance between August 2014 and December 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with HCC surveillance receipt during the 12‐month period preceding and 6‐month period after survey administration. We achieved a response rate of 71.8% (n = 541 of 753). Patients demonstrated high levels of HCC‐related knowledge (summary score, 77.7%); however, 48.6% believed that eating a healthy diet precluded the need for HCC surveillance, and 34.0% believed that HCC surveillance was not necessary if they had a normal physical exam and/or lacked clinical symptoms. Patients expressed worry about developing and dying from HCC, but nearly half (49.9%) of patients reported barriers to receiving HCC surveillance, including difficulty with the scheduling process (30.5%), costs of surveillance testing (25.3%), and transportation difficulties (17.3%). HCC surveillance receipt was significantly higher in patients who knew cirrhosis is a risk factor for developing HCC (odds ratio [OR], 3.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25‐7.62) and significantly lower in those reporting barriers to surveillance (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25‐0.70). Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis are knowledgeable and interested in HCC surveillance; however, patient‐reported barriers are associated with lower surveillance rates in clinical practice and represent potential intervention targets to improve HCC surveillance effectiveness. (H epatology 2017;65:875‐884).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.28770

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HCC is a common cause of death in patients with cirrhosis, and prior studies have suggested patients express fear of developing or dying from HCC.

    “HCC is a common cause of death in patients with cirrhosis, and prior studies have similarly suggested patients express fear of developing or dying from HCC.31,32”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 185

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Singal A, Volk M, Rakoski M, Fu S, Su G, McCurdy H, Marrero J. Patient Involvement is Correlated with Higher HCC Surveillance in Patients with Cirrhosis. J Clin Gastroenterol2011;45(8):727-32.

Authors
Farvardin, S., Patel, J., Khambaty, M., Yerokun, O. A., Mok, H., Tiro, J. A., Yopp, A. C., Parikh, N. D., Marrero, J. A., & Singal, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Parkland Health & Hospital System (US)
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Singal, Amit G.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2016-10-01
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
875-884
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2528614200
Cited by
185
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 3
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS022418, R24HS022418)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
HCC surveillance, liver cirrhosis, patient-reported barriers, surveillance adherence, patient knowledge, patient attitudes, cost barriers, transportation barriers, risk perception, socioeconomic deprivation, racial diversity
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Educational Status, Female, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Population Surveillance, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Risk Assessment, Insurance Coverage, Racial Groups, Early Detection of Cancer, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review