Cited by 42Liver physiology and pathologyTGF-β signaling in diseasesLiver Diseases and Immunity

Dynamic Transcriptional and Epigenetic Changes Drive Cellular Plasticity in the Liver

Open access
Merrell, Allyson J., Peng, Tao, Li, Jinyang, Sun, Kathryn, Li, Bin, Katsuda, Takeshi, Grompe, Markus, Tan, Kai +1 more·2021·Hepatology

Abstract

Background and Aims: Following liver injury, a fraction of hepatocytes adopt features of biliary epithelial cells (BECs) in a process known as biliary reprogramming. The aim of this study was to elucidate the molecular events accompanying this dramatic shift in cellular identity. Approach and Results: We applied the techniques of bulk RNA‐sequencing (RNA‐seq), single‐cell RNA‐seq, and assay for transposase‐accessible chromatin with high‐throughput sequencing to define the epigenetic and transcriptional changes associated with biliary reprogramming. In addition, we examined the role of TGF‐β signaling by profiling cells undergoing reprogramming in mice with hepatocyte‐specific deletion in the downstream TGF‐β signaling component mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (Smad4). Biliary reprogramming followed a stereotyped pattern of altered gene expression consisting of robust induction of biliary genes and weaker repression of hepatocyte genes. These changes in gene expression were accompanied by corresponding modifications at the chromatin level. Although some reprogrammed cells had molecular features of “fully differentiated” BECs, most lacked some biliary characteristics and retained some hepatocyte characteristics. Surprisingly, single‐cell analysis of Smad4 mutant mice revealed a dramatic increase in reprogramming. Conclusion: Hepatocytes undergo widespread chromatin and transcriptional changes during biliary reprogramming, resulting in epigenetic and gene expression profiles that are similar to, but distinct from, native BECs. Reprogramming involves a progressive accumulation of biliary molecular features without discrete intermediates. Paradoxically, canonical TGF‐β signaling through Smad4 appears to constrain biliary reprogramming, indicating that TGF‐β can either promote or inhibit biliary differentiation depending on which downstream components of the pathway are engaged. This work has implications for the formation of BECs and bile ducts in the adult liver.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.31704

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [2]Blanpain C, Fuchs E. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science (80-.) 2014; 344. PMC4523269 24926024
  2. [3]Michalopoulos GK. Advances in liver regeneration. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2014; 8: 897– 907. 24964729
  3. [5]Yanger K, Zong Y, Maggs LR, Shapira SN, Maddipati R, Aiello NM, Robust cellular reprogramming occurs spontaneously during liver regeneration. Genes Dev 2013; 27: 719– 724. 23520387 PMC3639413
  4. [8]Wu H, Wei L, Fan F, Ji S, Zhang S, Geng J, Integration of Hippo signalling and the unfolded protein response to restrain liver overgrowth and tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. [Internet] 2015; 6: 1– 15. Available from: 10.1038/ncomms7239 25695629 · DOI
  5. [9]He L, Li Y, Li Y, Pu W, Huang X, Tian X, Enhancing the precision of genetic lineage tracing using dual recombinases. Nat. Med 2017; 23: 1488– 1498. 29131159 PMC6913096
  6. [10]Wu N, Nguyen Q, Wan Y, Zhou T, Venter J, Frampton GA, The Hippo signaling functions through the Notch signaling to regulate intrahepatic bile duct development in mammals. Lab. Investig 2017; 97: 843– 853. 28581486 PMC5901959
  7. [11]Zhang N, Bai H, David KK, Dong J, Zheng Y, Cai J, The Merlin/NF2 Tumor Suppressor Functions through the YAP Oncoprotein to Regulate Tissue Homeostasis in Mammals. Dev. Cell [Internet] 2010; 19: 27– 38. Available from: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.015 PMC2925178 20643348 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Zong Y, Stanger BZ. Molecular mechanisms of liver and bile duct development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol 2012; 1: 643– 655. 23799566
  9. [13]Schaub JR, Huppert KA, Kurial SNT, Hsu BY, Cast AE, Donnelly B, De novo formation of the biliary system by TGFβ-mediated hepatocyte transdifferentiation. Nature [Internet] 2018; 557: 247– 251. Available from: 10.1038/s41586-018-0075-5 PMC6597492 29720662 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [14]Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, Jessell TM, Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev. Biol 2001; 1: 1– 8. 11299042 PMC31338
  11. [15]Yang X, Li C, Herrera PL, Deng CX. Generation of Smad4/Dpc4 conditional knockout mice. Genesis 2002; 32: 80– 81. 11857783
  12. [16]Zong Y, Panikkar A, Xu J, Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Lemaigre F, Notch signaling controls liver development by regulating biliary differentiation. Development [Internet] 2009; 136: 1727– 1739. Available from: 10.1242/dev.029140 PMC2673761 19369401 · DOI
  13. [18]Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM, Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell 2019; 177: 1888– 1902.e21. 31178118 PMC6687398
  14. [19]Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol 2018; 36: 411– 420. 29608179 PMC6700744
  15. [20]Van Der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res 2008; 9: 2579– 2625.
  16. [22]Qiu X, Hill A, Packer J, Lin D, Ma YA, Trapnell C. Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat. Methods 2017; 14: 309– 315. 28114287 PMC5330805
  17. [23]Azuma H, Paulk N, Ranade A, Dorrell C, Al-Dhalimy M, Ellis E, Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah−/−/Rag2 −/−/Il2rg−/− mice. Nat. Biotechnol 2007; 25: 903– 910. 17664939 PMC3404624
  18. [24]Grompe M, Strom S. Mice with human livers. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 1209– 1214. 24042096
  19. [25]Yanger K, Knigin D, Zong Y, Maggs L, Gu G, Akiyama H, Adult hepatocytes are generated by self-duplication rather than stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell [Internet] 2014; 15: 340– 349. Available from: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.003 PMC4505916 25130492 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [26]Nishikawa Y, Sone M, Nagahama Y, Kumagai E, Doi Y, Omori Y, Tumor necrosis factor-α promotes bile ductular transdifferentiation of mature rat hepatocytes in vitro. J. Cell. Biochem 2013; 114: 831– 843. 23097189
  21. [27]Overturf K, Al-Dhalimy M, Ou CN, Finegold M, Grompe M. Serial transplantation reveals the stem-cell-like regenerative potential of adult mouse hepatocytes. Am. J. Pathol 1997; 151: 1273– 1280. 9358753 PMC1858091
  22. [28]Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 2013; 10: 1213– 1218. 24097267 PMC3959825
  23. [30]Poncy A, Antoniou A, Cordi S, Pierreux CE, Jacquemin P, Lemaigre FP. Transcription factors SOX4 and SOX9 cooperatively control development of bile ducts. Dev. Biol. [Internet] 2015; 404: 136– 148. Available from: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.05.012 26033091 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [31]Adam RC, Yang H, Rockowitz S, Larsen SB, Nikolova M, Oristian DS, Pioneer factors govern super-enhancer dynamics in stem cell plasticity and lineage choice. Nature 2015; 521: 366– 370. 25799994 PMC4482136
  25. [32]Font-Burgada J, Shalapour S, Ramaswamy S, Hsueh B, Rossell D, Umemura A, Hybrid Periportal Hepatocytes Regenerate the Injured Liver without Giving Rise to Cancer. Cell 2015; 162: 766– 779. 26276631 PMC4545590
  26. [33]Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Cordi S, Zong Y, Tronche F, Stanger BZ, Intrahepatic Bile Ducts Develop According to a New Mode of Tubulogenesis Regulated by the Transcription Factor SOX9. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 2325– 2333. 19403103 PMC2743481
  27. [34]Clotman F, Jacquemin P, Plumb-Rudewiez N, Pierreux CE, Van Der Smissen P, Dietz HC, Control of liver cell fate decision by a gradient of TGFβ signaling modulated by Onecut transcription factors. Genes Dev 2005; 19: 1849– 1854. 16103213 PMC1186184
  28. [35]Ieda M, Fu JD, Delgado-Olguin P, Vedantham V, Hayashi Y, Bruneau BG, Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 2010; 142: 375– 386. 20691899 PMC2919844
  29. [36]Han DW, Tapia N, Hermann A, Hemmer K, Höing S, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into neural stem cells by defined factors. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10: 465– 472. 22445517
  30. [37]Tapscott SJ, Davis RL, Thayer MJ, Cheng PF, Weintraub H, Lassar AB. MyoD1: A nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a Myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblasts. Science (80-.) 1988; 242: 405– 411. 3175662
  31. [38]Yang L, Wang WH, Qiu WL, Guo Z, Bi E, Xu CR. A single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals precise pathways and regulatory mechanisms underlying hepatoblast differentiation. Hepatology 2017; 66: 1387– 1401. 28681484 PMC5650503
  32. [39]Halpern KB, Shenhav R, Matcovitch-Natan O, Tóth B, Lemze D, Golan M, Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver. Nature 2017; 542: 1– 5. PMC5321580 28166538
  33. [41]Li B, Dorrell C, Canaday PS, Pelz C, Haft A, Finegold M, Adult Mouse Liver Contains Two Distinct Populations of Cholangiocytes. Stem Cell Reports [Internet] 2017; 9: 478– 489. Available from: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.06.003 PMC5549808 28689996 · DOI
  34. [42]Zhang YE. Non-Smad pathways in TGF-β signaling. Cell Res 2009; 19: 128– 139. 19114990 PMC2635127
  35. [43]Qian L, Huang Y, Spencer CI, Foley A, Vedantham V, Liu L, In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature 2012; 485: 593– 598. 22522929 PMC3369107
  36. [44]Zhou Q, Brown J, Kanarek A, Rajagopal J, Melton DA. In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to β-cells. Nature 2008; 455: 627– 632. 18754011 PMC9011918

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merrell, A. J., Peng, T., Li, J., Sun, K., Li, B., Katsuda, T., Grompe, M., Tan, K., & Stanger, B. Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Stanger, Ben Z.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2021-07
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
444-457
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W3119139808
Cited by
42
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (2008-04062)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA233285, U2CCA233285)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK083355, DK08335)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
cellular plasticity, liver injury, TGF-beta signaling, SMAD4, chromatin accessibility, epigenetic modifications, gene expression changes, cholangiocytes, bile duct formation, hepatocyte differentiation
MeSH terms
Cell Plasticity, RNA-Seq, Animals, Bile Ducts, Cell Differentiation, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Hepatocytes, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Smad4 Protein, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review