The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does malnutrition affect survival in cirrhosis?
Open accessAbstract
A total of 1,053 cirrhotic patients were included in a prospective study to determine whether malnutrition is a risk factor for mortality in cirrhotic patients. Child-Pugh classification as well as clinical and biochemical variables were used to assess the severity of cirrhosis. Nutritional status was evaluated both by anthropometric and clinical measurements. Patients were defined as malnourished when midarm muscle area (MAMA) and/or midarm fat area (MAFA) were below the 5th percentile of an age- and sex-matched population. During follow-up, 419 patients died. The estimated survival rate was 82.7% at 1 year, 65.1% at 3 years, and 50.7% at 5 years. The presence of muscle depletion and/or of a steep reduction in fat deposits was associated with a higher risk of mortality (midarm muscle area, < 5th percentile, relative risk = 1.79; midarm fat area, < 5th percentile, relative risk = 1.35). When patients were stratified according to the Child-Pugh classification, cumulative survival was lower in patients with a reduction in muscle mass in Child-Pugh classes A and B (log rank: P = .027; P = .022, respectively) but not in class C. Conversely, a significant reduction in adipose tissue deposits appeared to have no independent impact on survival in any Child-Pugh class. When examined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, age, sex, bilirubin, cholinesterase, ascites, and esophageal varices were selected, whereas the parameters of nutritional status were not. This suggests that malnutrition, while strongly associated with the deterioration of liver function, cannot be considered an independent risk factor for mortality in a general population of cirrhotic patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
D'Amico, G., Garcia-Tsao, G., & Pagliaro, L. (2006) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013 · Cited by 2,687
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease
Merli, M., Berzigotti, A., Zelber-Sagi, S., Dasarathy, S., Montagnese, S., Genton, L., Plauth, M., & Parés, A. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.06.024 · Cited by 1,130
Self-citationESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Liver disease
Plauth, M., Cabré, E., Riggio, O., Assis-Camilo, M., Pirlich, M., Kondrup, J., Ferenci, P., Holm, E., vom Dahl, S., Müller, M. J., et al. (2006) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.018 · Cited by 688
Self-citationESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease
Plauth, M., Bernal, W., Dasarathy, S., Merli, M., Plank, L. D., Schütz, T., & Bischoff, S. C. (2019) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.022 · Cited by 674
Self-citationSarcopenia from mechanism to diagnosis and treatment in liver disease
Dasarathy, S., & Merli, M. (2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.040 · Cited by 608
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Merli, M., Riggio, O., & Dally, L.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1041-1046
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3171853910
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.