Use of A Designer Triple Expression Hybrid Clone for Three Different Lipoyl Domain for the Detection of Antimitochondrial Autoantibodies
Open accessAbstract
The detection of antimitochondrial autoantibodies (AMAs) is critical in the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, conventional laboratory assays to detect AMA are dependent on the time–consuming method of immunofluorescence microscopy, a method often plagued by problems of nonspecificity. AMAs react against mitochondrial autoantigens including the E2 components of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC–E2), the branched–chain 2–oxo–acid dehydrogenase complex (BCOADC–E2), and the 2–oxo–glutarate dehydrogenase complex (OGDC–E2). Interestingly, the immunodominant epitopes of PDC–E2, BCOADC–E2, and OGDC–E2 are all conformational lipoate binding sites, but antibodies against them do not cross–react. Although 80% to 90% of sera from patients with PBC react to PDC–E2, approximately 10% patients with PBC react only to BCOADC–E2 and/or OGDC–E2. We have taken advantage of our epitope–mapping studies of the E2 components of PDC, BCOADC, and OGDC, and constructed a “designer” hybrid clone, designated as pML–MIT3, that coexpresses the immunodominant epitopes within the three distinct lipoyl domains. We examined a total of 321 sera, including 186 sera from patients with PBC, to test the immunoreactivity of pMIT3. Of 186 sera from patients with PBC, 152 sera (81.7%) reacted with recombinant fusion protein of PDC–E2, whereas 171 sera (91.9%) showed positive reactivities when probed by immunoblotting against the recombinant fusion protein expressed from the pML–MIT3 clone. Of 34 PBC sera that did not react with recombinant PDC–E2, 18 sera contained BCOADC–E2–specific AMA and 1 serum possessed only OGDC–E2–specific AMA. We also developed an enzyme–linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using affinity–purified recombinant fusion protein of pML–MIT3 clone as the antigen source, to quantify specific AMAs in patients with PBC. None of the 135 control sera from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), chronic autoimmune hepatitis (CAH), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or healthy volunteers showed significant reactivity against pML–MIT3 recombinant fusion protein in the ELISA assay. Our results indicate that an ELISA using recombinant, cloned autoantigen of pML–MIT3 is a powerful and very specific method for the detection of AMA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
They are present in ~95% (mitochondrial) and ~30% (nuclear) of patients.
“They are present in ~95% (mitochondrial) and ~30% (nuclear) of patients.”
From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
Unlike in many other autoimmune diseases, these autoantibodies are, as a result of their sensitivity and specificity, extremely useful in diagnosis and have contributed significantly to the decline in the need for liver biopsy, at least for the purposes of diagnosis.
“Unlike in many other autoimmune diseases, these autoantibodies are, as a result of their sensitivity and specificity, extremely useful in diagnosis and have contributed significantly to the decline in the need for liver biopsy, at least for the purposes of diagnosis.”
From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
PBC is characterised serologically by autoantibodies specific for mitochondrial, nuclear and centromere antigens, some of which are unique to PBC.
“PBC is characterised serologically by autoantibodies specific for mitochondrial, nuclear and centromere antigens, some of which are unique to PBC.66–78”
From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Moteki, S., Leung, P. S., Coppel, R. L., Dickson, E. R., Kaplan, M. M., Munoz, S., & Gershwin, M. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-103
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086002849
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
- Keywords
- primary biliary cirrhosis, lipoyl domain, pyruvate dehydrogenase E2, epitope mapping, recombinant fusion protein, ELISA, autoantibody quantification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Epitopes, Autoantibodies, Autoantigens, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Cattle, Cloning, Molecular, Diagnosis, Differential, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase Complex, Ketone Oxidoreductases, Thioctic Acid, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Mitochondria, Molecular Sequence Data, Multienzyme Complexes, Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Restriction Mapping, Reproducibility of Results, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers, 3-Methyl-2-Oxobutanoate Dehydrogenase (Lipoamide), Rats, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review