Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Differential Induction of Prehepatic and Hepatic Metabolism of Verapamil by Rifampin

Open access
Fromm, M F, Busse, D, Kroemer, H K, Eichelbaum, M·1996·Hepatology

Abstract

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, which metabolize numerous drugs, are expressed both in liver and in extrahepatic tissues. CYP3A4 for example is present and inducible by rifampin in epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. It has been shown that such prehepatic metabolism contributes substantially to total clearance of CYP3A4 substrates (e.g., cyclosporine) before and even more pronounced during enzyme induction. We examined the effect of enzyme induction on prehepatic and hepatic metabolism of the model compound R/S–verapamil after simultaneous oral and intravenous administration using a stable isotope technology. This approach allows us to exclude intraindividual day–to–day variability and is therefore suitable to quantitatively assess prehepatic extraction of high–clearance drugs. Moreover, because verapamil is administered as a race–mate with the S–enantiomer being preferentially metabolized, we investigated the influence of induction on stereoselectivity of prehepatic and hepatic metabolism. Eight male volunteers received 120 mg of racemic verapamil bid for 24 days. Rifampin (600 mg daily) was given from day 5 to day 16. Systemic clearance and bioavailability of the verapamil enantiomers were determined by coadministering deuterated verapamil intravenously on day 4, on day 16, and on day 24. Effects of verapamil on atrioventricular conduction after oral and intravenous (iv) administration were assessed by measuring the maximum PR–interval prolongation Rifampin increased the systemic clearance of the active S–verapamil 1.3–fold ( P < .001). In contrast, rifampin increased the apparent oral clearance of S– verapamil 32–fold ( P < .001) and decreased its bioavailability 25–fold ( P < .001), with partial recovery after rifampin withdrawal ( P < .01). With rifampin, the effect of oral verapamil on atrioventricular conduction was nearly abolished ( P < .01), whereas no significant changes were observed after intravenous administration. Induction caused a considerable reduction of stereoselectivity after both intravenous and oral administration ( P < .001). Rifampin altered the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacological effects of verapamil to a much greater extent after oral administration compared with intravenous administration. These data clearly indicate that prehepatic metabolism of verapamil (presumably in the gut wall) is preferentially induced compared with hepatic metabolism and that stereoselectivity of verapamil metabolism is affected by induction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.510240407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fromm, M. F., Busse, D., Kroemer, H. K., & Eichelbaum, M.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1996-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
796-801
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964026490
Cited by
283
References
0
FWCI
14.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.