Open‐label trial of oral nalmefene therapy for the pruritus of cholestasis
Open accessAbstract
The aims of this study were to determine whether long-term oral administration of the opiate antagonist nalmefene is associated with any beneficial effects in patients with pruritus secondary to cholestatic liver disease and to assess the safety of long-term administration of this drug to these patients. Fourteen patients with unrelieved chronic pruritus of cholestasis were studied. Scratching activity, independent of limb movements, was recorded continuously for 24-hour periods before and during treatment with an initial ameliorating dose of nalmefene. Simultaneously, during these periods, visual analogue scores (VASs) of pruritus were recorded every 4 hours while patients were awake. The dose of nalmefene, which initially was 2 mg orally twice daily, was increased during the study, usually until a satisfactory clinical response was achieved. Five patients experienced a transient opioid withdrawal-like reaction that did not preclude continuing with nalmefene therapy. Serum biochemical indices of cholestasis did not change appreciably during treatment. Thirteen patients reported amelioration of the perception of pruritus on nalmefene. In 5 patients, exacerbations of pruritus occurred approximately 4 weeks after an initial ameliorating dose had been reached; these exacerbations were managed by increasing the dose. Baseline mean values for VAS and scratching activity were higher than corresponding means during nalmefene therapy in 13 (P =.002) and 12 (P = .013) patients, respectively. Possible tolerance to nalmefene occurred in 3 patients. Three patients experienced marked exacerbation of pruritus after nalmefene therapy was suddenly discontinued. Blood levels of nalmefene were consistent with normal pharmacokinetics of the drug. These results suggest that nalmefene may have a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio when it is administered orally long-term to patients with the pruritus of cholestasis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with high opioidergic tone may experience an opiate withdrawal-like reaction to opioid antagonists, characterized by abdominal pain, high blood pressure, tachycardia, goose bumps, nightmares, and depersonalization.
“Patients with high opioidergic tone may experience an opiate withdrawal-like reaction to opioid antagonists, characterized by abdominal pain, high blood pressure, tachycardia, goose bumps, nightmares, and depersonalization.(201)(202)(203)(204)”
From Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [203]
The Discussion links increased opioidergic tone in cholestasis to antagonist-induced withdrawal-like reactions. The Duration of Nalmefene Therapy section reports abdominal pain or cramps, goose bumps, and depersonalization; Table 3 also lists nightmares. The copy does not report high blood pressure or tachycardia as features of these reactions. Page numbers were not provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 182
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Elias E. Liver transplantation. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1993;27:224- 232.
- Hsiao J, Dixon R. Nalmefene: quantitation of a new narcotic antagonist in human plasma using HPLC with electrochemical detection. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 1983; 42: 449-454.
- Grahame-Smith DG, Aronson JK. The pharmacokinetic process. In: Oxford textbook of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University, 1992:13-39.
- Authors
- Bergasa, N. V., Schmitt, J. M., Talbot, T. L., Alling, D. W., Swain, M. G., Turner, M. L., Jenkins, J. B., & Jones, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bergasa, Nora V.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 679-684
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154052609
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- nalmefene, cholestatic liver disease, opioid antagonists, long-term oral administration, opioid withdrawal, drug tolerance, pharmacokinetics, scratching behavior, visual analogue score
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Cholestasis, Humans, Middle Aged, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Pruritus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review