Cited by 70Hepatitis C virus researchLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver physiology and pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Morphometry confirms fibrosis regression from sustained virologic response to direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C

Open access

Abstract

Sustained virologic response (SVR) after direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for chronic hepatitis C results in significant decreases in liver stiffness measured by transient elastography (TE). The aim of this study was to clarify if TE can guide post‐SVR management in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis prior to treatment as current guidelines are unclear on the role of TE after SVR. In total, 84 patients with hepatitis C virus and advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis and from a single center underwent DAA treatment and achieved SVR. Overall, 62% had improved liver stiffness that was consistent with regression of at least one stage of fibrosis. In the cirrhosis group, 48% showed fibrosis regression by at least two stages by TE (<9.5 kPa). In the F3 fibrosis group, 39% regressed by at least two stages (<7 kPa). The median time from SVR to regression by TE was 1 year. Fifteen patients with liver biopsies prior to SVR underwent a biopsy after SVR; 13 of these patients had improved liver stiffness (to <9.5 kPa). The post‐SVR liver biopsies of only 4 patients showed F1‐F2 while 11 patients showed F3‐F4; however, morphometry of the first 11 biopsied patients revealed that 10 patients had an average 46% decrease in collagen content. Conclusion: This is the first DAA study that also has paired liver biopsies showing fibrosis regression. After SVR is achieved, improvements in liver stiffness measured by TE are seen in a majority of patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis within 2 years. TE improvements are overstated when compared to histologic staging but confirmed with morphometric analysis. It is unclear whether TE following SVR can reliably predict when patients no longer require advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis monitoring after SVR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep4.1228

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liver fibrosis can be a reversible process under certain conditions, particularly if the underlying cause of injury is removed.

    “One of the most promising developments in the field is the growing consensus that liver fibrosis can be a reversible process under certain conditions, particularly if the underlying cause of injury is removed (84–86).”

    From Targeting macrophages in liver fibrosis (2026) · cites this paper as [84]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 2005, Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C, Hepatology, 41, 48, 10.1002/hep.20506 · DOI
  2. 2012, Levels of alanine aminotransferase confound use of transient elastography to diagnose fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10, 932, 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.015 · DOI
  3. 2012, Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C, Gastroenterology, 142, 1293, 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.017 · DOI
  4. 2018, Magnitude and kinetics of decrease in liver stiffness after anti‐viral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 16, 27, 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.04.038 · DOI
  5. 2017, Direct antiviral agent treatment of chronic hepatitis C results in rapid regression of transient elastography and fibrosis markers fibrosis‐4 score and aspartate aminotransferase‐platelet ratio index, Liver Int, 37, 369, 10.1111/liv.13256 · DOI
  6. 2017, Improvement of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who received direct‐acting antiviral therapy and achieved sustained virological response, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 32, 1982, 10.1111/jgh.13788 · DOI
  7. 2016, Regression of fibrosis and portal hypertension in HCV‐associated cirrhosis and sustained virologic response after interferon‐free antiviral therapy, J Viral Hepat, 23, 994, 10.1111/jvh.12578 · DOI
  8. 2017, Regression of liver fibrosis over a 24‐week period after completing direct‐acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving care within the national hepatitis C elimination program in Georgia: results of hepatology clinic HEPA experience, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, 1223, 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000964 · DOI
  9. 2015, Regression of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis measured by elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved sustained virologic response after treatment for HCV, Hepatology, 62, 264A
  10. 2008, Brief communication: the relationship of regression of cirrhosis to outcome in chronic hepatitis C, Ann Intern Med, 149, 399, 10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00006 · DOI
  11. 2000, Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy, Ann Intern Med, 132, 517
  12. 2015, Progressive fibrosis significantly correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with a sustained virological response, Hepatol Res, 45, 238, 10.1111/hepr.12331 · DOI
  13. 2015, EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2015, J Hepatol, 63, 199, 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.025 · DOI
  14. 2015, EASL‐ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: non‐invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis, J Hepatol, 63, 237, 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2017, American Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on the role of elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis, Gastroenterology, 152, 1536, 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.017 · DOI
  16. 2010, Aging of Hepatitis C (HCV)‐infected persons in the United States:a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression, Gastroenterology, 138, 513, 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.067 · DOI
  17. 2011, Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy, J Hepatol, 54, 650, 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.033 · DOI
  18. 2014, FibroFrance Study Group; Epic3 Study Group; Bordeaux HCV Study Group. Staging chronic hepatitis C in seven categories using fibrosis biomarker (FibroTest™) and transient elastography (FibroScan®), J Hepatol, 60, 706, 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.016 · DOI
  19. 1995, Chronic hepatitis. An update on terminology and reporting, Am J Surg Pathol, 19, 1409, 10.1097/00000478-199512000-00007 · DOI
  20. 1996, An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR cooperative Study Group, Hepatology, 24, 289, 10.1002/hep.510240201 · DOI
  21. 2013, The diagnostic accuracy of Fibroscan for cirrhosis is influenced by liver morphometry in HCV patients with a sustained virological response, J Hepatol, 59, 251, 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.013 · DOI
  22. 2016, Paired liver biopsy, Fibrotest and Fibroscan before and after treatment with DAA in liver transplanted recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: diagnostic accuracy and concordance, Hepatology, 64, 134A
  23. 2014, Early periportal sinusoidal fibrosis is an accurate marker of accelerated HCV recurrence after liver transplantation, J Hepatol, 61, 270, 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.029 · DOI
  24. 1994, A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparison with morphometric studies, Hepatology, 20, 349, 10.1002/hep.1840200213 · DOI
  25. 2007, Progression of fibrosis in advanced chronic hepatitis C: evaluation by morphometric image analysis, Hepatology, 45, 886, 10.1002/hep.21595 · DOI
  26. 2018, Direct‐acting antiviral therapy for chronic HCV infection results in liver stiffness regression over 12 months post‐treatment, Dig Dis Sci, 63, 486, 10.1007/s10620-017-4749-x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pan, J. J., Bao, F., Du, E., Skillin, C., Frenette, C. T., Waalen, J., Alaparthi, L., Goodman, Z. D., & Pockros, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Clinic (US)
  • Department of Pathology,La Jolla,CA
  • Scripps Green Hospital (US)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Inova Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Pockros, Paul J.
Venue
Hepatology Communications
Published
2018-09-21
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
1320-1330
ISSN
2471-254X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893430689
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
hepatitis C, direct-acting antivirals, sustained virological response, fibrosis regression, liver stiffness, transient elastography, liver cirrhosis, advanced liver fibrosis, collagen content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review