Cited by 32Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionLiver Disease and Transplantation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Single‐Center Experience on Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Patients With Cirrhosis

Open access

Abstract

Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) due to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is on the rise throughout the world by patients looking for “safer” alternatives. However, data on acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) due to CAM are lacking. In a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis, we retrospectively studied CAM‐related health‐seeking behavior and attempted to identify those who developed possible CAM‐DILI‐related ACLF. In this study, we examine the clinical, biochemical, and liver histopathologic characteristics of possible CAM‐DILI‐related ACLF, describe implicated CAM agents, and discuss predictors of patient outcomes. Out of 1,666 patients with cirrhosis, 68% used CAM at some point. A total of 35.7% (n = 30/84) patients presented with CAM‐related DILI leading to ACLF in the whole CAM‐DILI‐related decompensation cohort. The most common CAM was unlabeled polyherbal Ayurvedic formulations. Of possible patients with ACLF, 63% self‐medicated with CAM based on social media sharing. Mean age ± SD was 51.9 ± 9.9 years, 83% were male patients, median follow‐up duration was 173 (range, 14‐584) days, median Child‐Turcotte‐Pugh score was 13 (range, 10‐14), Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease‐sodium score was 30.1 ± 4.8, median chronic liver failure‐organ failure (CLIF‐C‐OF) score was 11 (range, 8‐14), and median CLIF‐C‐ACLF score was 98 (range, 87‐127). Portal‐based neutrophilic predominant mixed inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, autoimmune‐like features, and severe cholestasis were seen on liver biopsy. Overall, 53% of patients died (median survival 194 days). Baseline overt hepatic encephalopathy and CLIF‐C‐OF score, total bilirubin, hyponatremia and leukocytosis, and grade of ACLF predicted 1‐, 3‐, 6‐ and 12‐month mortality, respectively. Conclusion: Possible CAM‐DILI‐related ACLF has a high mortality. Strict monitoring and identification of CAM use among people with cirrhosis and an integrative public health educational practice can help ameliorate this modifiable risk factor that potentiates heavy liver disease burden and resource use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep4.1355

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some cohorts, DILI in patients with underlying liver disease has been associated with mortality rates as high as 16%, compared to ~5% in patients without pre-existing liver disease.

    “In some cohorts, DILI in patients with underlying liver disease has been associated with mortality rates as high as 16%, compared to ~5% in patients without pre-existing liver disease.8,27,28”

    From Ashwagandha-induced liver injury—A case series from India and literature review (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results (Outcomes and Significant Predictors; page unavailable) report mortality among patients with cirrhosis and possible CAM-related DILI, supporting the general point that DILI can be associated with death in patients with underlying liver disease. The paper reports 53% mortality in that cohort, however, and does not provide the claimed 16% versus approximately 5% comparison with patients without pre-existing liver disease. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ayurvedic herbal supplements have been implicated in serious liver injury, acute decompensation of cirrhosis, and acute-on-chronic liver failure.

    “Ayurvedic herbal supplements have been implicated in serious liver injury, acute decompensation of cirrhosis, and acute-on-chronic liver failure.7–9”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 2017, Examining the changing health care seeking behavior in the era of health sector reforms in India: evidences from the National Sample Surveys 2004 & 2014, Glob Health Res Policy, 2, 6, 10.1186/s41256-017-0026-y · DOI
  2. 2013, Which doctor for primary health care? Quality of care and non‐physician clinicians in India, Soc Sci Med, 84, 30, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.018 · DOI
  3. 2009, Ayurveda for comprehensive healthcare, Indian J Med Ethics, 6, 101
  4. 2018, Protecting the value of medical science in the age of social media and “fake news”, JAMA
  5. 2018, Ayurvedic and herbal medicine‐induced liver injury: it is time to wake up and take notice, Indian J Gastroenterol, 37, 5, 10.1007/s12664-018-0820-6 · DOI
  6. 2016, Acute‐on‐chronic liver failure in cirrhosis, Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2, 16041, 10.1038/nrdp.2016.41 · DOI
  7. 2017, Acute‐on‐chronic liver failure: an update, Gut, 66, 541, 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312670 · DOI
  8. 2017, Hepatic encephalopathy, Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 5, 138, 10.1093/gastro/gox013 · DOI
  9. 2013, Cirrhotic ascites review: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, World J Hepatol, 5, 251, 10.4254/wjh.v5.i5.251 · DOI
  10. 1988, Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach, Biometrics, 44, 837, 10.2307/2531595 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2016, Acute on chronic liver failure secondary to drugs: causes, outcome and predictors of mortality, J Hepatol, 64, S232, 10.1016/S0168-8278(16)00220-8 · DOI
  12. 2001, Complementary and alternative medicine in chronic liver disease, Hepatology, 34, 595, 10.1053/jhep.2001.27445 · DOI
  13. 2018, Clinical outcomes, histopathologic patterns and chemical analysis of Ayurveda and herbal medicine associated with severe liver injury‐a single‐center experience from southern India, Indian J Gastroenterol, 37, 9, 10.1007/s12664-017-0815-8 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2017, Death and liver transplantation within 2 years of onset of drug‐induced liver injury, Hepatology, 66, 1275, 10.1002/hep.29283 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2012, Herbal hepatotoxicity: a tabular compilation of reported cases, Liver Int, 32, 1543, 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2012.02864.x · DOI
  16. 2010, Aloe‐induced toxic hepatitis, J Korean Med Sci, 25, 492, 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.3.492 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2016, Poisoned after dinner: dolma with Datura stramonium, Turk J Emerg Med, 15, 51
  18. 2017, Review of Holarrhena antidysenterica (L.) Wall. ex A. DC.: pharmacognostic, pharmacological, and toxicological perspective, Pharmacogn Rev, 11, 141, 10.4103/phrev.phrev_31_16 · DOI
  19. 2017, Health effects of Psidium guajava L. leaves: an overview of the last decade, Int J Mol Sci, 18, pii:E897, 10.3390/ijms18040897 · DOI
  20. 2018, Potent antibacterial, antioxidant and toxic activities of extracts from Passiflora suberosa L. leaves, PeerJ, 6, e4804, 10.7717/peerj.4804 · DOI
  21. 2011, Adhatoda vasica Nees: phytochemical and pharmacological profile, Nat Prod J, 1, 29
  22. 2016, Clinical features and outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine induced acute liver failure and injury, Am J Gastroenterol, 111, 958, 10.1038/ajg.2016.114 · DOI
  23. 2017, CSH guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of drug‐induced liver injury, Hepatol Int, 11, 221, 10.1007/s12072-017-9793-2 · DOI
  24. 2014, ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury, Am J Gastroenterol, 109, 950, 10.1038/ajg.2014.131 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Philips, C. A., Paramaguru, R., Augustine, P., Rajesh, S., Ahamed, R., George, T., & Padsalgi, G.
Affiliations
  • General Hospital Ernakulam (IN)
  • PVS Memorial Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Philips, Cyriac Abby
Venue
Hepatology Communications
Published
2019-04-12
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
1001-1012
ISSN
2471-254X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939861386
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
complementary and alternative medicine, drug-induced liver injury, acute-on-chronic liver failure, liver cirrhosis, Ayurvedic polyherbal formulation, self-medication, social media health information, mortality risk factors, hepatic encephalopathy, CLIF-C ACLF score, liver histopathology, hepatocyte ballooning, cholestasis, hepatotoxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review