Cited by 79Ergonomics and Human FactorsOccupational Health and Safety ManagementManagement Systems and Quality Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Ergonomics Improve Product Quality and Reduce Costs? A Review Article

Zare, Mohsen, Croq, Michel, Hossein‐Arabi, Farhad, Brunet, Rene, Roquelaure, Yves·2016·Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries

Abstract

Competition is an ongoing challenge confronting industrial corporations, particularly automobile manufacturing. Striving to improve product quality and productivity, automotive industries have used different quality management approaches, such as reduced variability, total quality management, and lean management, over recent years. Furthermore, incorporating proactive ergonomics such as physical and organizational ergonomics and psychosocial factors into the structure of a company is considered to be a support for productivity and quality. Several studies have shown the effects of ergonomics on better quality. Application of both quality management approaches and ergonomics in an integrated manner in the manufacturing production system is emphasized because they are similar concepts with the same objectives, that is, to improve efficiency. In this study, a comprehensive review was undertaken and 25 studies were reviewed in order to define how integration of an ergonomic approach in the manufacturing production system can reduce defects and improve quality in the production process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hfm.20623

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Almgren J., 2012, The influence of production ergonomics on product quality (Unpublished master's thesis)
  2. Axelsson J.(2000).Quality and ergonomics—towards successful integration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Linköping University Linköping Sweden.
  3. 10.1002/hfm.20228 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.001 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0169-8141(91)90004-6 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/hfm.20060 · DOI
  7. da Silva M. P., 2012, Is there enough information to calculate the financial benefits of ergonomics projects, Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 41, 476, 10.3233/WOR-2012-0199-476 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/hfm.20223 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00146-003-0248-z · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.001 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0003-6870(95)95747-N · DOI
  12. 10.1504/IJISE.2008.020683 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/00207540903555502 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/hfm.20172 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.02.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.05.002 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.ergon.2013.11.013 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/00140139.2013.875597 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199924)9:1<105::AID-HFM6>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  20. 10.1080/00140130600900431 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00116-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1108/EUM0000000005713 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.01.003 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00078-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/hfm.20233 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0169-8141(94)00028-2 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00062-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/9780470712184 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1108/01443570410558049 · DOI
  30. Ilardi J. S., 2012, Relationship between productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorder risk among deboning workers in a Chilean salmon industry, Work, 41, 5334, 10.3233/WOR-2012-0052-5334 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/0020754031000077293 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/hfm.20078 · DOI
  33. Larson N., 2012, 3M Brazil ergonomics: A success story in the making, Work, 41, 5977, 10.3233/WOR-2012-0997-5977 · DOI
  34. Larson N., 2012, 30 years of ergonomics at 3M: A case study, Work, 41, 5091, 10.3233/WOR-2012-1043-5091 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.015 · DOI
  36. Liljedahl A., 2012, Managing production deviations: A case study at Scania AB
  37. 10.1002/hfm.1020 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/10803548.2003.11076559 · DOI
  39. Neubert N., 2012, The charge of ergonomics—a model according to the influence of ergonomic workplace design for economical and efficient indicators of the automotive industry, Work, 41, 4389
  40. Neumann W. P.(2004).Production ergonomics: Identifying and managing risk in the design of high performance work systems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Lund University Sweden.
  41. 10.1108/01443571011075056 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.010 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/00207540210148862 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/00140139.2012.706714 · DOI
  45. 10.1108/01443570610678666 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00065-6 · DOI
  47. Silva K. M., 2012, The footwear factory's assembly sector: Opposing organizational structure and quality from the ergonomic work analysis, Work, 41, 1683, 10.3233/WOR-2012-0645-1683 · DOI
  48. Taleghani M., 2010, Key factors for implementing the lean manufacturing system, Journal of American Science, 6, 287
  49. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.12.017 · DOI
  50. Toledo B., 2012, Global ergonomics strategy in Volkswagen: F the product construction, over the planning until the serial process, Work, 41, 4413
  51. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.05.006 · DOI
  52. Vieira L., 2012, Ergonomics and kaizen as strategies for competitiveness: A theoretical and practical in an automotive industry, Work, 41, 1756, 10.3233/WOR-2012-0381-1756 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/03085149200000016 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00051-9 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.12.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zare, M., Croq, M., Hossein‐Arabi, F., Brunet, R., & Roquelaure, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR)
  • Occupational Medicine Safety and Health Department, SCANIA Production Angers SAS Anger France
  • Département de l'Ergonomie Groupe PSA Peugeot‐Citroën Paris France
  • Laboratory of Ergonomics and Epidemiology in Occupational Health (LEEST), LUNAM University University of Angers Angers France
  • Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (FR)
Corresponding author
Zare, Mohsen
Venue
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-25
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
205-223
ISSN
  • 1090-8471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6564
OpenAlex
W2100186414
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
LEEST
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Human Factors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
Keywords
human factors, product quality, cost reduction, automotive manufacturing, total quality management, lean manufacturing, defect reduction, psychosocial factors, organizational ergonomics, physical ergonomics, manufacturing productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review