Cited by 88Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

Corticosterone shifts different forms of synaptic potentiation in opposite directions

Krugers, Harm J., Alfarez, Deborah N., Karst, Henk, Parashkouhi, Keyvan, van Gemert, Neeltje, Joëls, Marian·2005·Hippocampus

Abstract

Calcium entering the cell via different routes, e.g.,N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs), plays a pivotal role in hippocampal synaptic potentiation. Since corticosteroid hormones have been reported to enhance calcium influx through VDCCs, one may predict that these hormones facilitate hippocampal synaptic efficacy. Surprisingly, though, stress and corticosteroids have so far been found to reduce synaptic potentiation. Here, we addressed this apparent paradox and examined synaptic potentiation in the CA1 area of hippocampal slices from mice with low basal corticosterone levels 1--4 h after a brief in vitro administration of corticosterone. Nifedipine and APV were used to isolate NMDA receptor-mediated and VDCC-mediated long-term potentiations (LTPs), respectively. We report that corticosterone facilitates synaptic potentiation that depends on activation of VDCCs while impairing synaptic plasticity that is mediated by NMDA receptor activation. The glucocorticoid-receptor (GR) antagonist RU 38486 blocked both the effects of corticosterone. These results indicate that the net effect of corticosteroid hormones on synaptic plasticity is determined by the balance between different types of potentiation, a balance that may be region specific and depends on the experimental conditions. We speculate that these opposite effects on synaptic efficacy are involved in the bidirectional modulation of cognitive performance by corticosteroid hormones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20092

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 88

Authors
Krugers, H. J., Alfarez, D. N., Karst, H., Parashkouhi, K., van Gemert, N., & Joëls, M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Krugers, Harm J.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
697-703
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2152754557
Cited by
88
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
corticosterone, synaptic potentiation, long-term potentiation, NMDA receptor, voltage-gated calcium channels, hippocampal CA1, glucocorticoid receptor, mifepristone, nifedipine, APV, synaptic plasticity, stress
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium Channel Blockers, Corticosterone, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Synaptic Transmission, Organ Culture Techniques, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Stress, Physiological, Synapses, Calcium Channels, Mifepristone, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Calcium Signaling, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review