Cited by 88Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The medial and lateral entorhinal cortex both contribute to contextual and item recognition memory: A test of the binding ofitems and context model

Hunsaker, Michael R., Chen, Victoria, Tran, Giang T., Kesner, Raymond P.·2013·Hippocampus

Abstract

It has been suggested that the role of the hippocampus for episodic memory is to selectively bind together item and contextual information. One such model, the Binding of Items and Context (BIC) model, proposed that the perirhinal cortex provides item and the postrhinal/parahippocampal cortex provides context to the hippocampus via the medial (MEC) and lateral entorhinal cortices (LEC) to be bound into an episodic representation. This model proposes that item and context information are stored and processed independently and in parallel before hippocampal processing. To evaluate this model, the present experiment evaluated the role of the MEC and LEC for item and contextual novelty detection. The present results suggest that excitotoxic lesions to the LEC primarily disrupt item novelty detection, whereas lesions to the MEC primarily disrupt contextual novelty detection. These data provide a functional double dissociation between the MEC and LEC across item and contextual processing. Despite this dissociation, the present results suggest that item and contextual information are not represented independently before hippocampal processing. These data support the basic assumptions of the BIC model, but suggest that item and context information may interact in the entorhinal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.22097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 88

Authors
Hunsaker, M. R., Chen, V., Tran, G. T., & Kesner, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Kesner, Raymond P.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-25
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
380-391
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W2059686693
Cited by
88
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024146)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
medial entorhinal cortex, lateral entorhinal cortex, episodic memory, novelty detection, excitotoxic lesions, double dissociation, perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, memory binding
MeSH terms
Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Ibotenic Acid, Male, Models, Psychological, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Signal Detection, Psychological, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Entorhinal Cortex, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review