The medial and lateral entorhinal cortex both contribute to contextual and item recognition memory: A test of the binding ofitems and context model
Abstract
It has been suggested that the role of the hippocampus for episodic memory is to selectively bind together item and contextual information. One such model, the Binding of Items and Context (BIC) model, proposed that the perirhinal cortex provides item and the postrhinal/parahippocampal cortex provides context to the hippocampus via the medial (MEC) and lateral entorhinal cortices (LEC) to be bound into an episodic representation. This model proposes that item and context information are stored and processed independently and in parallel before hippocampal processing. To evaluate this model, the present experiment evaluated the role of the MEC and LEC for item and contextual novelty detection. The present results suggest that excitotoxic lesions to the LEC primarily disrupt item novelty detection, whereas lesions to the MEC primarily disrupt contextual novelty detection. These data provide a functional double dissociation between the MEC and LEC across item and contextual processing. Despite this dissociation, the present results suggest that item and contextual information are not represented independently before hippocampal processing. These data support the basic assumptions of the BIC model, but suggest that item and context information may interact in the entorhinal cortex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LEC is critical for the memory of associations between different objects, even contexts.
“This finding is in agreement with others, indicating the LEC is critical for the memory of associations between different objects, even contexts (Hunsaker et al., 2013; Kuruvilla and Ainge, 2017; Wilson et al., 2013b; Wilson et al., 2013c).”
From The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties (2020) · cites this paper as Hunsaker et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Hunsaker, M. R., Chen, V., Tran, G. T., & Kesner, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kesner, Raymond P.
- ORCID
- Hunsaker, Michael R.
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-25
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 380-391
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W2059686693
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024146)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- medial entorhinal cortex, lateral entorhinal cortex, episodic memory, novelty detection, excitotoxic lesions, double dissociation, perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, memory binding
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Ibotenic Acid, Male, Models, Psychological, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Signal Detection, Psychological, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Entorhinal Cortex, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review